STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Md. Nasim" <mnasim2008 AT gmail.com>]

Hi All,

           I have been invited by the organizer of AUM to give a talk on yield and flow measurements from STAR BES.

Please let me know your comments and suggestions.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/55089

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Takafumi Niida <niida AT bnl.gov>
Date: Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Star-talks-l] STAR presentation by Md Nasim for AUM 2021 submitted for review
To: Star-talks-l <star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Md. Nasim <mnasim2008 AT gmail.com>

Dear Nasim,

Nice and comprehensive slides. I have some suggestions below for your consideration. Also it would be nice to send the link to FCV and LFSUPC PWGs for possible comments (no need to create new entry in drupal).

s6: “signature of a change in degrees of freedom (baryon to meson or hadrons to QGP)” I’m a bit confused with this. Do you want to say that there are two possible explanations? i.e. net-baryon density becomes maximum around sNN~6 GeV by “baryon to meson” and phase transition by “hadrons to QGP”?

s7: 

- \phi seems to be written with capital letter.

- Suppression -> suppression

s8:

- \phi seems to be written with capital letter.

- remove “(i)” from both bullets

- “Evidence of rescttering” I guess you mean this for K*0. Can you clarify? Also would be nice if you can add the information on lifetime and scattering cross section to understand the statement. 

s9: Even for 200 GeV, we need better statistics. So I would remove “for sqrt(sNN)<19 geV” and add Run23-25 in addition to BES-2.

s11: 

- less importance of parton energy loss

- someone may say no energy loss at 19.6 GeV

s13:

- put slide number

- "<= 11.5 GeV"  ->  "<= 19.6 GeV” (I don’t see clear separation at 19.6 GeV)

- “-> Probably dominated by hadronic interaction"

s14:

- “<pT> of \phi…” This may be true but having large errors one could say that pbar is also independent of centrality at least for mult>100.

s15: can you put text for the right figure to make it clear what is plotted? (y-title is small)

s22: In 2nd bullet, follow -> seems to follow. (just to soften the statement since one could say that Lambda and hypernuclei are on different line)

s23: 

- “Kinetic and… are measured”: I suggest to rephrase this since you show such parameters only in slide 5.

- formation -> (hyper)nuclei production

s24:

- put slide number

- put text like “collider mode” for the upper right figure and “fixed-target mode” for the bottom table.

Best regards,

Takafumi

On May 30, 2021, at 6:06 AM, Md. Nasim via Star-talks-l <star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi All,

           I have been invited by the organizer of AUM to give a talk on yield and flow measurements from STAR BES.

Please let me know your comments and suggestions.

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 2:34 AM webmaster--- via Star-talks-l <star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Md Nasim (mnasim2008 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review, please 
have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/55089

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-talks-l mailing list
Star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-talks-l

--

Thanks,

With Best Regards,

Nasim

_______________________________________________
Star-talks-l mailing list
Star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-talks-l

--

Thanks,

With Best Regards,

Nasim