Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Jie Zhao for SQM 2021 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jie Zhao <jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com>
  • To: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Jie Zhao for SQM 2021 submitted for review
  • Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 00:11:28 +0800

Dear ShinIchi,

thanks for your nice suggestions, i had updated the draft according to your comments in the link below:.

In order to avoid promising the 8-fold, I would just say 
“Higher statistics dataset from isobar taken in 2018 and future Au+Au 
data in 2023-2025 would …"
this number has been written in the STAR BUR, probably is ok
promising 8-fold would better give people a feeling how much improvement we would expect.

This reminds me some of our requests for you on this analysis, 
to show us the other contributions in terms of the v2 signal, 
for example, rho peak, as well as the combinatorial and the 
residual BG. You might have shown us on the K0s signal, but 
I do not remember others, sorry, if I’ve missed. I hope you come 
back to the PWG to show in near future. 

yes, right now as you know the isobar analysis is ongoing, we will come back to this in near future.

Thanks and Best regards!
Jie






On Jul 31, 2021, at 7:19 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Jie
Thanks for the nice write-up. I would sign off with some minor comments.
After signing off from one of other conveners, you can go to star talk.  
Best regards, ShinIchi

The last sentence of the 1st paragraph of section 2 in page 1,
“identify” would be changed to “select pi+/- candidate”

Fig.2 and other other figures. The legend would be ordered
according to the mass pi, K, K0s, p, phi, Lambda, Xi, Omega,
and choose open/filled symbol for meson/baryon.  

At the end of the 1st sentence in page 3, I would add
“only for the last one or two points at high pT.”

The next sentence "… according to the fitted function shown in the …"

At the end of the next sentence just after Fig.3, I would add
“, where it could also be given by some combined states as well.”

In order to avoid promising the 8-fold, I would just say
“Higher statistics dataset from isobar taken in 2018 and future Au+Au
data in 2023-2025 would …"


On Jul 31, 2021, at 2:44, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Jie Zhao (jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,  
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/55768

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page