star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions
- From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:34:25 +0900
Dear Sergei
Thanks for the interesting results. I just like to make sure your “r” and “l” are
zdc Psi1 planes without flipping the angle between the forward and backward,
therefore the raw signal from “l” is only reversed, while “r” and “r-l” are expected
to be the same for the first page on the global signal, right? For the local signal,
“tr” and “tl” are same to start with, so I was wondering you could even improve the
TPC resolution (full TPC E.P.) without making eta-subevent, but just by excluding
the pair of daughter tracks from the full TPC Q-vector for each lambda, only if
they are part of the Q-vector. With this you could gain in statistics, that we do not
need to exclude lambda decaying daughters going to forward and backward, in
addition to the E.P. resolution improvement, that is also effective gain in statistics.
Have you considered? We could do this pair-by-pair, or by making many small
eta slices to exclude this auto correlation (as you taught me long time ago:),
although we always need to think about primary and global track relation and/or
correspondence. Your current methods would be more safe and robust, so we
might like to choose for the final results anyway, but I just thought about the most
aggressive way to improve statistics by seeing your word “requiring both daughters
to be opposite side of TPC (w.r.t. 2-sub E.P.)”. Anyway thanks a lot for the nice
result. Maybe you have other new directions to go?
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Oct 28, 2021, at 9:30, Sergei Voloshin via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:_______________________________________________Dear all,I have some results on hyperon polarization in isobar collisions, butI was not able to join the meeting today, and I will not be able to do it next week.I decided to put a short presentation at the protected area:My results should be considered as an independent cross-check of the results presented by Takafumi (no significant differences observed so far).All the hyperon selection cuts are the same as used in Takafumi's analysis.Any comments are very welcome.Best regards,Sergei--======================================
Sergei A. Voloshin
Professor of Physics, Wayne State University,
666 W. Hancock, Detroit, Michigan, 48201
e-mail: sergei.voloshin AT wayne.edu
Phone: 1-313-577-1630; Fax: 1-313-577-0711
======================================
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions,
Sergei Voloshin, 10/27/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions,
ShinIchi Esumi, 10/27/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions, Sergei Voloshin, 10/27/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] hyperon polarization in isobar collisions,
ShinIchi Esumi, 10/27/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.