Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] Glauber fit in CME paper

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Fuqiang Wang <fqwang AT purdue.edu>
  • To: Chunjian Zhang <chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu>, Chirality and Vorticity PWG STAR Flow <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Star-Cme-Focusgroup-L <star-cme-focusgroup-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Glauber fit in CME paper
  • Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:35:08 -0400

Hi Chunjian,

Do you mean the scaling in the vertical axis?
I think it’s just a plotting convenience. 

The Glauber is fit to the data in the range of Nch>50 I believe. 

Best regards,
Fuqiang

—————————
Fuqiang Wang
Professor of physics
Purdue University 


On Nov 1, 2021 at 10:06 AM, <Chunjian Zhang via Star-fcv-l> wrote:

Dear experts,

Hi. Based on our recent study, I have one comment on the CME paper Glauber fit.

I could not find any hints that the Glauber fit was scaled by a factor to match the STAR multiplicity trend. To me, it’s a misleading that I would like to believe and be surprised that the case3 describe the tend so well. (I believe the outside people will also have the same opinion as mine) I do think the CME author and experts need to consider mention this in the revised CME paper when you comment on the referee reports.

Thank you and best regards
Chunjian
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page