STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Chunjian Zhang <chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu>]

Dear Fuqiang,

Hi. Thank you for your comments. Yes. In the vertical axis, what’s the actual value of the scale factor? Would not we let the audience know this in the paper clearly?Even in the talk, nobody mention this. I would not say let’t the audience guess there is no any  “tricky” process. 

 Also, please find the similar recent study in slides 4 https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/nuclear%20deformation%20and%20neutronSkin_isobar_FCV1026_CZhang.pdf. It must have one value around 0.99 or 0.98 to something else scaling. 

Best regards 

Chunjian 

On Nov 1, 2021, at 10:35 AM, Fuqiang Wang <fqwang AT purdue.edu> wrote:

Hi Chunjian,

Do you mean the scaling in the vertical axis?

I think it’s just a plotting convenience. 

The Glauber is fit to the data in the range of Nch>50 I believe. 

Best regards,

Fuqiang

—————————

Fuqiang Wang

Professor of physics

Purdue University 

On Nov 1, 2021 at 10:06 AM, <Chunjian Zhang via Star-fcv-l> wrote:

Dear experts,

Hi. Based on our recent study, I have one comment on the CME paper Glauber fit.

I could not find any hints that the Glauber fit was scaled by a factor to match the STAR multiplicity trend. To me, it’s a misleading that I would like to believe and be surprised that the case3 describe the tend so well. (I believe the outside people will also have the same opinion as mine) I do think the CME author and experts need to consider mention this in the revised CME paper when you comment on the referee reports. 

Thank you and best regards 
Chunjian 
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l