STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Adams, Joseph R." <adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu>]

Hi conveners, 

Thanks you for the helpful comments. I have implemented all but one of Jiangyong's which I address below; the new version is posted.

on y across the full range of hyperon production in y-->over a wide range in y.

>> I disagree; it misses the point that although the range in y is the same as in previous studies, here the hyperon production limits are the same as our reconstruction limits in rapidity.

Best,

- Joey

---

From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 1:35 AM
To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-fcv-l] Comments for Joseph Adams for QM22 talk from FCV conveners

 

Dear Joey (and Kosuke)

The followings are comments on your merged talk abstract from conveners. 

Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi

---------------------------------------

Jiangyong

too many references, suggest to limit to 3 or less.

Add STAR in the title

huge vorticity-->large global vorticity

were achieved by operating the STAR experiment in fixed-target mode-->were achieved in fixed-target collision mode.  

on y across the full range of hyperon production in y-->over a wide range in y.

no trend-->no such trend

suggested in [3] is-->Ref.[3] suggests

Delete "however, the statistics are too limited to make a significant measurement." since later you discuss 19 and 27 GeV.

Prithwish

Too many references and the most important one is missing. 

We suggest to cite “https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00044” and see if we can reduce the list of references.

“​​​​implying a huge vorticity” → “implying strong vortical structures are created” 

“In fixed-target” →”in the fixed-target”

“allowed for the measurement” → “allowed a measurement” 

“allows for the comparison to the large number of” →”allows comparison with a large number of” 

“Despite these calculations” → “In contrary to these calculations”

“on y as √s_NN is reduced” → “on y with decreasing √s_NN” 

“we see no trend within uncertainties which may challenge” → “we see no trend in data within uncertainties. Our measurements may challenge”   

“Additionally, suggested in [3] in as enhanced” → “Additionally, Ref. [3] suggests an enhancement of” 

“...beam energies; however, the statistics are too limited to make a significant measurement” 

→ 

“...beam energies. However, the statistics of our previously published datasets were limited to make a significant measurement to test such a prediction.”  

“would set the scale on the” → “would set a limit on the”

“to study the magnitude of splitting” → “to search for possible splitting” 

ShinIchi

L4: “achieved” -> “collected or acquired”

L8-9: “y” is repeated several times...

Instead of the last few sentences in the 1st paragraph, we can just say “we compared with several model calculations…” 

The 2nd paragraph is a little too long, but I agree with this discussion without any promise, as we will be able to show the difference, if we can publish before QM. 

---------------------------------------

On Nov 19, 2021, at 6:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Joseph Adams (adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu) has submitted a material for a  
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57305

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l