STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[dshen <dshen AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Conveners,

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. We have revised the abstract 
accordingly except two of followings.

The first one is from on the title, we prefer to use the original title 
instead of "Splitting of rapidity-odd directed flow slope & implication 
for electromagnetic effect in Au+Au and isobar collisions from STAR".
The reason is that the suggested title can not properly reflect the 
significance of our measurement. In STAR previous publications, there 
are many measurements on the rapidity-odd directed flow, such like BES-I 
or D(bar) mesons. Even at LHC, they also measured charge dependent flow 
but for all charges in 10-40% centrality, and their results sharply 
contradict to theoretical calculation both in magnitude and sign. Our 
measurement, for the first time, connect the experiment and theory.  The 
results are significant and can be easily explained by transported quark 
+ EM-field, therefore we prefer to use more attractive title which is 
the original one.

The second comment is from ShinIchi, which shows some concerns on the 
text of "This is the the first observation.."
The full sentence now is "This is the first observation of a significant 
negative \Delta dv1/dy between proton and anti-proton."
It is the first observation of negative \Delta dv1/dy between p-pbar, I 
think we can safely say it.

New abstract: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57368

Thanks,
Diyu


On 2021-11-22 14:34, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Diyu
>
> The followings are comments on your merged talk abstract from
> conveners.
> Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Prithwish
> "Evidence of the electromagnetic effect obtained with STAR’s
> directed flow
> measurements in Au+Au, ^96_44Ru+^96_44Ru and ^96_40Zr+^96_40Zr
> collisions"
> -->
> "Splitting of rapidity-odd directed flow slope & implication for
> electromagnetic effect in Au+Au and isobar collisions from STAR"
> "Non-central heavy-ion collisions" -->"Heavy ion collisions"
> "with large statistics accumulated" --> "with large statistics
> datasets accumulated"
> "while no signal has been observed in Au+Au and isobar" -->"while no
> significant slope-difference is observed in Au+Au and isobar
> collisions"
> Jiangyong
> L1 the evolution of which could de-->the evolution of which was
> predicted
> L3 isobar--> 96Ru+96Ru and 96Zr+96Zr isobar
> L4 The dv1/dy splitting--> the charge dependent dv1/dy splitting,
> \Delta(dv1/dy)
> L5  centrality changes from central to peripheral-->as a function of
> centrality from central to peripheral collisions
> L6 significantly negative..--> significant negative \Delta(dv1/dy)
> between proton and anti-proton
> L9 while no signal-->while no difference
> L11 but meets the --> but qualitatively agree with theoretical
> expectation in the presence
> ShinIchi
> I wonder if we really need/like to say “This is the first
> observation…”
> L:9 “no signal “ -> “no difference”
> L:12 add “at peripheral collisions”
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> > On Nov 21, 2021, at 12:18, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Diyu Shen (shendiyu AT sinap.ac.cn) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57316
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l