STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[rishabh <rishabh AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Prithwish,

Thank you so much for your suggestions. I have addressed your comments 
and have made the required changes.

-Following your suggestion, I have removed “anti-” from the first 
paragraph and kept it only where it was necessary.

-Yes, you are right that there are no transported anti-nucleons. 
However, now that I am not writing “anti-” repeatedly, I hope it looks 
okay.

-What I was trying to convey from the line “Studying the azimuthal 
anisotropy of light (anti-)nuclei and comparing them [...]” was the 
concept of mass number scaling. Comparing the v2/A of various light 
nuclei with the v2 of protons can give insights into the coalescence 
mechanism. However, I have rephrased the line and I hope the updated one 
looks better.

-For the present study, we will use the nucleon phase space information 
from the AMPT model and the dynamical coalescence model to reproduce the 
elliptic flow results. Therefore, in the updated abstract, I am writing  
“AMPT + coalescence” model.

The link to the updated abstract is: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58635

Please let me know if there are any further clarifications required from 
my end.

Thanks and regards,
Rishabh Sharma



On 2022-03-05 17:44, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Rishabh,
>  Please find my comments on your nice abstract. I suggest we go for
> another iteration.
>
> The abstract is a bit hard to read due to "(anti-)" coming up multiple
> times. I don't have a good suggestion about how to improve it. Maybe
> we can just write nuclei and nucleon throughout the text and at the
> end say both "nuclei" and "anti-nuclei".  Alternatively, we just spell
> out nuclei and anti-nuclei.
>
> line 8:
> "...of produced or transported (anti-)nucleons"
> I am not sure if this is correct. There are no transported
> anti-nucleons since the colliding ions have no anti-nucleons.
>
> line 11:
> I don't understand this line. Can you please explain what you mean:
> "Studying  the  azimuthal  anisotropy  of  light (anti-)nuclei  and
> comparing  them  with  that  of  (anti-)nucleons  provides  an
> opportunity  to  understand the production mechanism of light
> (anti-)nuclei in heavy-ion collisions."
>
> line 19:
> Can we be specific about which model we are going to show?
>
> Best,
> Prithwish
>
>
> On 2022-03-03 15:26, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Rishabh Sharma (rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> > submitted a
> > material for a review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58635
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l