Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Gene van Buren <gene AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:00:58 -0400

Thanks, Gene,
As Haojie's plots show on a finer time scale, each fill has drifts up to
~30 um in vx but actually
quite a bit larger in vy. I don't know which direction thee machine used to
tune the collision
rate, could be either.

In any case, your second point brings up a real potential for difference
between
Ru and Zr that should be investigated. We did try to get the TPC occupancy
to be the same between Ru and Zr, by tuning the ZDC coincidence rate
to be equal, but i don't actually know the level to which that was
successful.
Since the overall reconstruction efficiency depends on TPC occupancy, there
could
be a systematic difference there. How different is the occupancy
between Ru and Zr?
--J


> On Apr 26, 2022, at 11:54 PM, Van Buren, Gene <gene AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jamie and all,
>
> On this particular point....
>
>> On Apr 26, 2022, at 7:53 PM, James Dunlop via Star-fcv-l
>> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> The beam shifts by ~40 um all the time. It's beam steering at that level,
>> often used to level our luminosity.
>
> I offer the following not as a contradiction, but as complementary
> information on the beam positions (and I'm certainly not making any kind of
> statement on noticeable impacts from beam positions on track reconstruction
> efficiency)...
>
> The mean <Vx> at z=0 for each fill (which I labeled as "x0") is shown in
> the below plot obtained from only a small fraction of the event statistics.
> The colors show the two beam species. I would conclude that whatever beam
> steering they were doing, they managed to get x0 consistent within a given
> species to within +/-15 microns fill-to-fill. If it weren't for that
> consistency, we wouldn't see the apparent offset between the two species.
>
> But on the core topic of this thread of tracking efficiency differences
> between the two species, I do not have the confidence to say that
> SpaceCharge & GridLeak distortion corrections are consistent between the
> two species at the level necessary to avoid systematic track reconstruction
> efficiency differences at the 0.1% level. That level of confidence would be
> difficult to achieve, in my opinion.
>
> -Gene
>
> <PastedGraphic-1.png>

--
He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work
hours.
James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781
Building 510A Cell: (631)316-8153
P.O. Box 5000 Fax: (631) 344-4206
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973
dunlop AT bnl.gov





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page