STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Priyanshi,

Nice slides. I have following comments/suggestions for your 
consideration.

In general since the analysis is done on a smaller fraction of isobar 
data, please indicate how much fraction is used and how much is left to 
be analyzed. Please be aware that if you release these preliminaries 
with smaller number of events, you will not be able to change it until 
publication. Also follow our recommendations send by Prithwish.

slide#3 v2(Ru+Ru)/v2(Zr+Zr)!=1, already observed that is your right most 
plot. Do you mean, you want to expand the study using identified 
particles?

slide#5: Resolution figure: Indicate the TPC, Psi_{2} resolution, 
eta-range used etc.
Do you apply resolution on an event by event basis or ?

slide#6&7: All the figures, mention collision system, beam energy etc 
informations.

slide#10: Although we recommend to remove the Omega v2, the Xi points 
also appears to be not smooth as function of pT, probably because of 
statistical fluctuations.

slide#12: Are there systematic uncertainties on the ratio plots on the 
bottom panels?
Can you fit the ratio with a straight line and extract a number with 
stat and syst errors?

slide#13&14: Are too busy. Is there a system size dependence ordering 
between the difference systems Cu+Cu, Isobars, Au+Au, U+U?

Thanks and regards,
Subhash





On 2022-05-31 11:56 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Priyanshi Sinha (priyanshisinha AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> submitted a
> material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59781
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l