STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Subhash,
Thank you for the suggestions. I have updated the slides with examples 
of analysis cut variations.
updated 
slide:https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_slide_v3.pdf

Regards,
Prabhupada

On 2022-06-26 21:22, subhash wrote:
> Dear Prabhupada,
>
> slide#4: "Source of systematic uncertainty: Various analysis cuts 
> variation"
> Could you indicate examples of analysis cut variations.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2022-06-24 07:12 PM, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Subhash and Prithwish,
> > Thank you for the comments and suggestions. I have updated my slides
> > accordingly. Below are some answers to your comments.
> > To Subhash:
> > > > For the Omega, is it combined Omega- and Omega+ ?
> > No, It's only Omega-.
> > > > Can you do similar fit, I mean either fit to KS0 or phi for both v2 
> > > > and v3?
> > Yes, I have fitted with KS0 and updated the slides.
> > > > Right two v3 figures: Define what is p0, is it fit to all particles?
> > It's a simultaneous fit to all the particles ratio except KS0.
> > > > Can you do the similar straight line fit for left v2 figure as well.
> > I tried doing the same but a zeroth order polynomial is not fitting
> > the v2/nq of particles well, because for lambda and proton the ratio
> > is not flat with pT so fitting with pol0 is giving wrong results.
> > To Prithwish:
> > > > Slide#5: Can you please remind me why BES-II TPC EP resolution is 
> > > > 10%
> > > > larger even with the same acceptance?
> > The acceptance is not same. The eta acceptance is increased for EP
> > (-1.5 < eta < 1.5) compared to BES-I.
> > I have also added a slide of centrality dependence v2 plot at 19.6 
> > GeV.
> > The link to the updated slide:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_slide_v2.pdf
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prabhupada
> >
> >
> > On 2022-06-23 20:07, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear Prabhupada,
> > >   Nice slides. Please consider my following comments. With these
> > > included I sign off.
> > >
> > > Slide#4: Indicate the number of events analyzed. Also, please add a
> > > statement about your source of systematics.
> > > Slide#5: Can you please remind me why BES-II TPC EP resolution is 10%
> > > larger even with the same acceptance?
> > > Slide#12:  I am not sure if this statement is correct: "Third order
> > > flow coefficient (v3) is proportional to the v_2^{3/2}"
> > > How about:
> > > "Correlation between v_3 and v_2^{3/2}"
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Prithwish
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2022-06-23 00:08, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a 
> > > > material for a
> > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60028
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l