STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[vipul <vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Subhash,

Thank you for your comments.

Please find updated slides in the following link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Vipul_ICHEPtalk2022_v2.pdf

Thanks,
With Regards,
Vipul

On 2022-06-26 21:01, subhash wrote:
> Dear Vipul,
>
> I sign off with two minor comments:
>
> slide#3: strange hadrons gives direct --> "direct" seems to be hidden
> under the isobar cartoon. Please check.
> slide#6: 1st bullet, for V0 reconstruction, you can probably mention
> reconstruction method: KFParticle or Traditional topological cuts
> using Helix method.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2022-06-24 08:51 PM, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Prithwish,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. We have updated
> > the presentation with these.
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Vipul_ICHEPtalk2022_v1.pdf
> >
> > Please find my reply to questions inline below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > With Regards,
> > Vipul
> >
> > On 2022-06-23 01:21, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear Vipul,
> > >   Nice slides, please consider my following comments. With these
> > > included I sign off.
> > >
> > > General comments:
> > > Put a comment on the errorbars on each slide showing the plots like
> > > you do on slide#13. Specify if only statistical errors are plotted.
> > > References: Use the standard format, such as "M. S. Abdallah et al.
> > > (STAR Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901". Cosmetic suggestion:
> > > it would be good to use similar color for the references (say blue).
> > >
> > >
> > > Slide#2: "ΨR" --> "Ψ_R"
> > > Slide#2: "stage of" --> "stages of"
> > >
> > > Slide#3: How about this: "System size dependence of the azimuthal
> > > anisotropy" --> "System size dependence of the azimuthal
> > > anisotropy by comparing isobars, Cu+Cu, Au+Au and U+U"
> > > Slide#3: "STAR, Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) 14901" --> "M. S. Abdallah et
> > > al. (STAR Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901"
> > >
> > > Slide#4: "Approximately 1.3 B events have been analys(z)ed" -- Not
> > > clear, is this for each species ?
> > total events are 1.3 B (Ru+Ru plus Zr+Zr).
> > We have updated the slide with analysed events individual for each 
> > system now.
> >
> > > Slide#4: Somewhere on this slide or later you need to add a comment 
> > > on the
> > >  sources of systematics for this analysis.
> > >
> > > Slide#5: "φi --> φ_i"
> > > Slide#5: "two different windows" --> "two different pseudorapidity 
> > > windows"
> > > Slide#5: In the third bullet add "using η-sub event approach". An
> > > average sign <..> is missing in this equation inside "√".
> > > Slide#5: In the legend of the figure: "Ψ_2<....>0.05<|η|<1.0" --> 
> > > "Ψ_2
> > > (0.05<|η|<1.0)", remove the space and put parentheses.
> > >
> > > Slide#6: Can we make the figures bigger?
> > Yes. We have increased the size of figures.
> >
> > > Slide#7: "with a function" --> "with a Fourier fit function"
> > > Slide#7: what is the rapidity window for these results ?
> > The rapidity window is added to the plots.
> >
> > > Slide#10: Why the acceptance for φ is different from that of Ξ ?
> > > According to slide 8, don't we have φ meson results for |y|<1 ? Is
> > > this a typo ?
> > No. It's not a typo, for current results phi-meson rapidity window is
> > |y| < 0.5 and for other particles it is |y| < 1.0.
> > Later, we will do phi-meson analysis also in the same |y| < 1.0.
> >
> > > Slide#11: The rapidity window should be mentioned.
> > >
> > > Slide#12: I realized that the legends for the black dashed lines are
> > > missing in the plots, we can add them next to the numbers in the 
> > > blue.
> > > Slide#12: Looking at the numbers for Λ, I see that the ratio is about
> > > 2% which is larger from what we saw in STAR isobar paper for charged
> > > hadrons (~1%) in mid-central events. We need to understand this. Can
> > > you remind me how were the systematic errors propagated in the ratio?
> > We first added statistical and systematic uncertainties in quadrature
> > for the v2 results then for the ratio, we have propagate error
> > according to the standard error propagation formula (assuming
> > independent measurements for different systems).
> >
> > > Slide#12: "May indicate larger nuclear deformity
> > > in Ru than in Zr nucleus" --> "May indicate nuclear shape and
> > > structure difference between the two isobars"
> > >
> > >
> > > Slide#13: "*Error bars..." -- Good, add such comments on other slides 
> > > as well.
> > > Slide#13: Polish the last bullet to indicate that there are large 
> > > systematics.
> > >
> > > Slide#14: "May indicate higher deformation in Ru than in Zr nuclei"
> > > --> "May be related to nuclear shape and structure difference between
> > > the two isobars"
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Prithwish
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2022-06-22 11:00, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material 
> > > > for a
> > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60024
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l