Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Joseph Adams for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Adams, Joseph R." <adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu>
  • To: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Joseph Adams for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:42:09 +0000

Hi Subhash,

Thanks for the comments; I've uploaded the edited draft. 

I agree that it would be nice to have a figure, but I'm very tight on space considering all of the different results that need to be discussed. I would also argue it's not that necessary in my case, because (1) many of the results being discussed are shown in posters and have plots shown in others' proceedings, and (2) the stuff not shown in others' posters include the 3 GeV result which is published already and the splitting "results" at 19.6 and 27 GeV which include a second preliminary (oops!!) and will be irrelevant as soon as the actual results are published. If you or others feel strongly, though, I'm open to including them.

Best,


- Joey


From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2022 12:34 AM
To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Adams, Joseph R. <adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Joseph Adams for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
 


Dear Joey,

Very nicely written proceedings and I enjoy reading it. I have a few
comments for your consideration:

In general, we include physics figures in the proceedings, especially
new measurements. I understand there are substantial number figures and
you probably try to avoid it due to page limit.

The abstract can be shortened a bit.

line 77: these discussions (?)

line 82: mass-square information

line 84: "a series of conditions" --> You could mention
KFP/helix/topology cuts and/or refer to previous studies.

line. 85: quite pure --> You could add typical purity achieved.

line 90: double the resolution --> Do you mean Psi1?

line 95: how about saying traditional invariant mass-method?

line 154: you could mention "within uncertainties."

line 167: I don't understand what do you mean by "there also recover the
familiar differential dependencies." You could rephrase it.

line 176: voriticity formation within the medium formed in heavy ion
collisions.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash



On 2022-07-22 11:59 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Joseph Adams (adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu) has submitted a material
> for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60374__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhb6RgPgA$
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhBxybJAw$



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page