STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Yicheng,

Very nice proceedings. I have the following suggestions for your 
consideration:

line 40-43: Please correct the definition of v2^∗.
It sounds like v2^∗ is defined as resolution in line 40.

line 59: We usually say mid-central

Fig. 1 caption: "The centrality range is 20–50%, which is defined by the 
POI
multiplicity." --> Is it the default centrality from StRefMult, or with 
a different track selections?

line 60-67: NS, AS and RG seem to be in subscript, you can make then 
normal.

line 69: I am not sure I understand this line: "taking half of it as 
systematic uncertainty,..". Can you rephrase it.

line 80: flows --> flow

line 82: Remove "For safety". Maybe you can rephrase it, conservative 
systematic uncertainty.
systematical --> systematic

line 83: by using Eq 5

line 84-85: The full-event and sub-event appears here for the first 
time. Probably you can add a reference or add a sentence here.
line 84: How about saying, Following the above procedure for sub-events, 
we estimate the equivalent of eqn 7 as ...

line 89: Using the above informations, we obtain an improved background 
estimate of isobar ratio ...

I sign off with these addressed.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2022-08-19 02:51 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Yicheng Feng (feng216 AT purdue.edu) has submitted a material for a 
> review,
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60563
>
> Deadline: 2022-08-28
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l