STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Vipul,

Nice proceedings. I sign off with a few minor suggestions:
In abstract:
200 GeV, try to void line break.

The ratio of ⟨v2⟩ between isobar species shows ... deformation in these 
species.

systematic size dependence --> system size dependence

line 16: ... RHIC collected data by colliding isobar species Ru+Ru and 
Zr+Zr at 200 GeV.
Start a new line: It is dedicated to ....

line 24: could be crucial

line 33: A total of ∼650 M minimum bias events --> I think we should 
mention total samples taken. You could rephrase something like, A total 
of ∼650 M minimum bias events out of X.X B are used for this analysis.

line 34: Either use The multi-strange hadrons or, the above hadron 
species ...

line 36:  using a track rotation method

line 38: add ranges of eta-sub selection

line 44: particle type dependence (baryon vs meson)

line 55: About 2% ... is observed, which is consistent with the 
expectation from the difference ...

line 65: It also indicates that the ...
I think we could mention pt range where the coalescence picture is 
valid.

line 83: These measurements could shed light ...

I think we don't need a dot at the end of each reference. Please double 
check with suggested proceedings format.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash




On 2022-10-14 07:13 PM, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Prithwish,
>
> Thank you your comments and suggestions.
> I have updated the proceedings and removed the older version. Please
> find the link to the updated proceedings.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v1.pdf
>
> I have added following sentence for the v2 ratio between Ru and Zr:
> A $\sim$2\% deviation from unity with a significance of 6.25$\sigma$
> for $\Lambda(\bar{\Lambda})$ and 1.83$\sigma$ for $K_{s}^{0}$ is
> observed,
> consistent with the difference between the nuclear structures of the
> two isobar nuclei.
>
> Fig.4 and 6 has both the error added in quadrature. So I have added
> following sentence:
> The error bars represent statistical and systematic uncertainties
> added in quadrature.
>
> Fig.5 has both the systematic and statistical errors shown separately.
>
> Thanks,
> With Regards,
> Vipul
>
> On 2022-10-14 03:21, Prithwish Tribedy wrote:
> > Dear Vipul,
> >  Here are my comments on your nice proceedings. With these
> > incorporated, I sign off.
> >
> > Abstract:
> > "indicating a difference" --> "that is consistent with the difference"
> >
> > "when compared" --> "when comparing" or say "...between isobar and
> > ..(other) systems"
> >
> > line 4: "the key observable" --> "one of the key observables"
> >
> > line 6: "Anisotropic flow is usually refers to" --> "Such an
> > observable measures"
> >
> > line 12: "re-scattering" --> "rescatterings"
> >
> > line 14: "during" --> "in"
> >
> > line 16: "data of" --> "data in collisions of isobars"
> >
> > line 18: "called the" --> "driven by a phenomenon called the"
> >
> > line 18: "The two isobars" --> "It was realized that the two isobars"
> >
> > line 20: "importantly measurement" --> "importantly, measurements"
> >
> > line 24: You are saying "in heavy-ion collisions" should you instead
> > say "in isobar collisions"
> >
> > line 26: "respect the event" --> "respect to the event"
> >
> > line 30: "and properties of" --> "and the properties of"
> >
> > line 32: "proceeding" --> "proceedings"
> >
> > line 41: "shows pT" --> "shows the pT"
> >
> > line 44: "which suggest the formation of the" --> "which suggests the
> > formation of a"
> > I think this point about "QGP medium in isobar" is redundant.
> >
> > line 48: Add "v2(pT) of" after "show" & revise the sentence
> >
> > line 55: It is not clear what you mean by "2% within statistical
> > uncertainties". Are you saying "2% deviation that statistically
> > significant". Or, maybe you quote the significance of the deviation to
> > make things clear. Something like "about 6 sigma for "\Lambdas" but
> > less than 2 sigma for K_s0". Please make this clear.
> >
> > Fig.4 and below: Somewhere you have to mention that you're showing
> > statistical uncertainties only.
> >
> > line 56: "which might be effect of different deformation parameters"
> > --> Maybe rephrase it like "consistent with the difference between the
> > nuclear structures of the two isobar nuclei".
> >
> > line 61: "remove effect of" --> "remove the effect of"
> >
> > line 64: Define NCQ
> >
> > line 65: "indicate" --> "indicates"
> >
> > line 65: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >
> > line 66: Remove "process"
> >
> > line 76: "and three" --> "and in three"
> >
> > line 78: "hydrodynamics" --> "hydrodynamic"
> >
> > line 80: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >
> > line 84: "nuclear density for the medium produced" --> Not clear what
> > you mean. Maybe say something like "collision geometry on anisotropic
> > particle production".
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2022-10-10 11:46, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear Conveners,
> > >
> > > Please find below link to the ICHEP-2022 proceedings.
> > > Please give your comments and suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > With Regards,
> > > Vipul
> > >
> > > On 2022-10-10 21:03, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material 
> > > > for a
> > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61281
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l