star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Re: [Star-fcv-l] Star-fcv-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 16

From: 胡强 <qianghu AT impcas.ac.cn>
To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Star-fcv-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 16
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 21:04:04 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Dear All,

I would like to give an update of Spin Hall Effect study in this week's FCV
meeting. I will send out the slides later.

Best regards,

Qiang Hu

> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: star-fcv-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> 发送时间: 2022-10-17 13:06:59 (星期一)
> 收件人: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> 抄送:
> 主题: Star-fcv-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 16
>
> Send Star-fcv-l mailing list submissions to
> star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> star-fcv-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> star-fcv-l-owner AT lists.bnl.gov
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Star-fcv-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for ICHEP 2022
> submitted for review (subhash)
> 2. Re: STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for ICHEP 2022
> submitted for review (pdixit)
> 3. Re: STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for ICHEP 2022
> submitted for review (vipul)
> 4. Re: STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for ICHEP 2022
> submitted for review (pdixit)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:35:39 +0530
> From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> To: vipul <vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for
> ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
> Message-ID: <8dd06eb305ef4adc7f95d7724f91b1ab AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Dear Vipul,
>
> Thanks for considering my suggestions. Please find my replies inline.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2022-10-16 12:58 PM, vipul wrote:
> > Dear Subhash,
> >
> > Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
> > I have modified the proceedings. Please find the updated version in
> > the following link:
> >
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v2.pdf
> >
> > Please find my replies on some of your comments inline below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > With regards,
> > Vipul
> >
> > On 2022-10-16 07:20, subhash wrote:
> >> Dear Vipul,
> >>
> >> Nice proceedings. I sign off with a few minor suggestions:
> >> In abstract:
> >> 200 GeV, try to void line break.
> >>
> >> The ratio of ?v2? between isobar species shows ... deformation
in
> >> these species.
> >>
> >> systematic size dependence --> system size dependence
> >>
> >> line 16: ... RHIC collected data by colliding isobar species
Ru+Ru and
> >> Zr+Zr at 200 GeV.
> >> Start a new line: It is dedicated to ....
> >>
> >> line 24: could be crucial
> >>
> >> line 33: A total of ?650 M minimum bias events --> I think
we should
> >> mention total samples taken. You could rephrase something like,
A
> >> total of ?650 M minimum bias events out of X.X B are used for
this
> >> analysis.
> > -- Could you please provide number of total events for isobars
(X.X) to
> > write.
>
> Please check the isobar blind paper for reference.
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00596__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!Gap2M-AnXd7fAw6fFvwnU3K6CRoK6V58DRkPw-FfH8RPPM-PccBSqqTb2UZIdHZPGKKe6KLSX7v_8bsVlKvmiOeGJFCl$

>
> >>
> >> line 34: Either use The multi-strange hadrons or, the above
hadron
> >> species ...
> >>
> >> line 36: using a track rotation method
> >>
> >> line 38: add ranges of eta-sub selection
> > -- Please suggest a sentence to write.
>
> You must have an eta range for two sub-events. What I ask is to mention
> the ranges and the eta-gap.
>
> >>
> >> line 44: particle type dependence (baryon vs meson)
> >>
> >> line 55: About 2% ... is observed, which is consistent with the
> >> expectation from the difference ...
> >>
> >> line 65: It also indicates that the ...
> >> I think we could mention pt range where the coalescence picture
is
> >> valid.
> > -- In this paragraph, I am discussing the NCQ scaling of v2 as a
> > function of KE_T in which the scaling is valid for the measured KE_T
> > range that can be seen by the figure 5. I don't know where I can
> > mention pt range in these sentences, If possible, please suggest a
> > modified sentence.
> >
>
> I am fine with current wordings.
>
>
> >>
> >> line 83: These measurements could shed light ...
> >>
> >> I think we don't need a dot at the end of each reference. Please
> >> double check with suggested proceedings format.
> > -- I have checked the author manual provided by the Proceedings of
> > Science. It has a dot at the end of each reference.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks and regards,
> >> Subhash
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2022-10-14 07:13 PM, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>> Dear Prithwish,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you your comments and suggestions.
> >>> I have updated the proceedings and removed the older
version. Please
> >>> find the link to the updated proceedings.
> >>>
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v1.pdf
> >>>
> >>> I have added following sentence for the v2 ratio between Ru
and Zr:
> >>> A $\sim$2\% deviation from unity with a significance of
6.25$\sigma$
> >>> for $\Lambda(\bar{\Lambda})$ and 1.83$\sigma$ for
$K_{s}^{0}$ is
> >>> observed,
> >>> consistent with the difference between the nuclear
structures of the
> >>> two isobar nuclei.
> >>>
> >>> Fig.4 and 6 has both the error added in quadrature. So I
have added
> >>> following sentence:
> >>> The error bars represent statistical and systematic
uncertainties
> >>> added in quadrature.
> >>>
> >>> Fig.5 has both the systematic and statistical errors shown
> >>> separately.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> With Regards,
> >>> Vipul
> >>>
> >>> On 2022-10-14 03:21, Prithwish Tribedy wrote:
> >>>> Dear Vipul,
> >>>> Here are my comments on your nice proceedings. With
these
> >>>> incorporated, I sign off.
> >>>>
> >>>> Abstract:
> >>>> "indicating a difference" --> "that is consistent
with the
> >>>> difference"
> >>>>
> >>>> "when compared" --> "when comparing" or say
"...between isobar and
> >>>> ..(other) systems"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 4: "the key observable" --> "one of the key
observables"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 6: "Anisotropic flow is usually refers to" -->
"Such an
> >>>> observable measures"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 12: "re-scattering" --> "rescatterings"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 14: "during" --> "in"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 16: "data of" --> "data in collisions of
isobars"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 18: "called the" --> "driven by a phenomenon
called the"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 18: "The two isobars" --> "It was realized that
the two
> >>>> isobars"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 20: "importantly measurement" --> "importantly,
measurements"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 24: You are saying "in heavy-ion collisions"
should you instead
> >>>> say "in isobar collisions"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 26: "respect the event" --> "respect to the
event"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 30: "and properties of" --> "and the properties
of"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 32: "proceeding" --> "proceedings"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 41: "shows pT" --> "shows the pT"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 44: "which suggest the formation of the" -->
"which suggests
> >>>> the
> >>>> formation of a"
> >>>> I think this point about "QGP medium in isobar" is
redundant.
> >>>>
> >>>> line 48: Add "v2(pT) of" after "show" & revise the
sentence
> >>>>
> >>>> line 55: It is not clear what you mean by "2% within
statistical
> >>>> uncertainties". Are you saying "2% deviation that
statistically
> >>>> significant". Or, maybe you quote the significance of
the deviation
> >>>> to
> >>>> make things clear. Something like "about 6 sigma for
"\Lambdas" but
> >>>> less than 2 sigma for K_s0". Please make this clear.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fig.4 and below: Somewhere you have to mention that
you're showing
> >>>> statistical uncertainties only.
> >>>>
> >>>> line 56: "which might be effect of different
deformation parameters"
> >>>> --> Maybe rephrase it like "consistent with the
difference between
> >>>> the
> >>>> nuclear structures of the two isobar nuclei".
> >>>>
> >>>> line 61: "remove effect of" --> "remove the effect
of"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 64: Define NCQ
> >>>>
> >>>> line 65: "indicate" --> "indicates"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 65: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 66: Remove "process"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 76: "and three" --> "and in three"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 78: "hydrodynamics" --> "hydrodynamic"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 80: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >>>>
> >>>> line 84: "nuclear density for the medium produced"
--> Not clear
> >>>> what
> >>>> you mean. Maybe say something like "collision geometry
on
> >>>> anisotropic
> >>>> particle production".
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Prithwish
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2022-10-10 11:46, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Conveners,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please find below link to the ICHEP-2022
proceedings.
> >>>>> Please give your comments and suggestions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> With Regards,
> >>>>> Vipul
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2022-10-10 21:03, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
wrote:
> >>>>>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has
submitted a material
> >>>>>> for a
> >>>>>> review, please have a look:
> >>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61281
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> If you have any problems with the review
process, please contact
> >>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>>>>>
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:17:36 +0530
> From: pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> To: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and
> Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for
> ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
> Message-ID: <cd932d0316916cbe20ea1f36f763b8df AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Dear Subhash,
> Thank you for the comments and suggestion. The corrected version of the
> proceeding can be found in the link below. Please have a look.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v2.pdf
>
> Regards,
> Prabhupada
> On 2022-10-16 09:02, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Prabhupada,
> >
> > Nice proceedings. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:
> >
> > abstract: add a space between KS0 and Lambda
> > remove 14.6. You are not showing anything from this energy.
> > The hydrodynamically motivated ratio ... is presented as a function
of
> > pT
> >
> > line 11: If Psi_n is event plane here, then you need resolution
factor
> > in equation 2
> >
> > line 13: remove initial
> >
> > line 16-17: To overcome this problem, --> I don't understand the
> > problem here. I think you mean multi-strange hadrons are not
affected
> > by late stage hadronic rescattering. Could you rephrase the
sentence.
> >
> > line 19: You could elaborate/specify on the detector upgrades and
> > increase in number of events here.
> >
> > line 24-26: I think the "? ? ??????" is the inverse of dN/d? right.
> > First define it then say it is used to flaten the event plane.
> >
> > line 26-27: Please rephrase it.
> >
> > line 28: Add the the eta regions of sub-events?
> >
> > line 35: particles and anti-particles --> Mention particle
species
> > here.
> >
> > line 48: define what is modified ncq here
> >
> > line 53: this could be due to the effect from transported quarks
> >
> > line 61: weak dependence on pT above 1.5 GeV/c
> >
> > line 68: because its dominant cause is --> may be due to the
initial
> > eccentricity ....
> >
> > line 70: because its main cause --> because it is expected
from the
> > event-by-event fluctuation ....
> >
> > line 72: which can be attributed to ...
> >
> >
> > I sign off with these addressed.
> >
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Subhash
> >
> >
> > On 2022-10-11 03:34 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >>
> >> Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a
material
> >> for a
> >> review, please have a look:
> >> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61286
> >>
> >> ---
> >> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> >> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:26:18 +0530
> From: vipul <vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> To: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for
> ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
> Message-ID: <ddf6e096ae8dcfa9119ca32dddbdcd65 AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions.
> I have included them and updated the proceedings.
>
> Please find below link to the updated version:
>
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v2_0.pdf
>
> Thanks,
> With Regards,
> Vipul
>
> On 2022-10-17 08:35, subhash wrote:
> > Dear Vipul,
> >
> > Thanks for considering my suggestions. Please find my replies
inline.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Subhash
> >
> > On 2022-10-16 12:58 PM, vipul wrote:
> >> Dear Subhash,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
> >> I have modified the proceedings. Please find the updated
version in
> >> the following link:
> >>
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v2.pdf
> >>
> >> Please find my replies on some of your comments inline below.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> With regards,
> >> Vipul
> >>
> >> On 2022-10-16 07:20, subhash wrote:
> >>> Dear Vipul,
> >>>
> >>> Nice proceedings. I sign off with a few minor suggestions:
> >>> In abstract:
> >>> 200 GeV, try to void line break.
> >>>
> >>> The ratio of ?v2? between isobar species shows ...
deformation in
> >>> these species.
> >>>
> >>> systematic size dependence --> system size dependence
> >>>
> >>> line 16: ... RHIC collected data by colliding isobar
species Ru+Ru
> >>> and
> >>> Zr+Zr at 200 GeV.
> >>> Start a new line: It is dedicated to ....
> >>>
> >>> line 24: could be crucial
> >>>
> >>> line 33: A total of ?650 M minimum bias events --> I
think we should
> >>> mention total samples taken. You could rephrase something
like, A
> >>> total of ?650 M minimum bias events out of X.X B are used
for this
> >>> analysis.
> >> -- Could you please provide number of total events for isobars
(X.X)
> >> to write.
> >
> > Please check the isobar blind paper for reference.
> >
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00596__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!Gap2M-AnXd7fAw6fFvwnU3K6CRoK6V58DRkPw-FfH8RPPM-PccBSqqTb2UZIdHZPGKKe6KLSX7v_8bsVlKvmiOeGJFCl$

> >
> >>>
> >>> line 34: Either use The multi-strange hadrons or, the above
hadron
> >>> species ...
> >>>
> >>> line 36: using a track rotation method
> >>>
> >>> line 38: add ranges of eta-sub selection
> >> -- Please suggest a sentence to write.
> >
> > You must have an eta range for two sub-events. What I ask is to
> > mention the ranges and the eta-gap.
> >
> >>>
> >>> line 44: particle type dependence (baryon vs meson)
> >>>
> >>> line 55: About 2% ... is observed, which is consistent with
the
> >>> expectation from the difference ...
> >>>
> >>> line 65: It also indicates that the ...
> >>> I think we could mention pt range where the coalescence
picture is
> >>> valid.
> >> -- In this paragraph, I am discussing the NCQ scaling of v2 as a
> >> function of KE_T in which the scaling is valid for the measured
KE_T
> >> range that can be seen by the figure 5. I don't know where I can
> >> mention pt range in these sentences, If possible, please
suggest a
> >> modified sentence.
> >>
> >
> > I am fine with current wordings.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>> line 83: These measurements could shed light ...
> >>>
> >>> I think we don't need a dot at the end of each reference.
Please
> >>> double check with suggested proceedings format.
> >> -- I have checked the author manual provided by the Proceedings
of
> >> Science. It has a dot at the end of each reference.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and regards,
> >>> Subhash
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2022-10-14 07:13 PM, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>>> Dear Prithwish,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you your comments and suggestions.
> >>>> I have updated the proceedings and removed the older
version. Please
> >>>> find the link to the updated proceedings.
> >>>>
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_Vipul_v1.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> I have added following sentence for the v2 ratio
between Ru and Zr:
> >>>> A $\sim$2\% deviation from unity with a significance of
6.25$\sigma$
> >>>> for $\Lambda(\bar{\Lambda})$ and 1.83$\sigma$ for
$K_{s}^{0}$ is
> >>>> observed,
> >>>> consistent with the difference between the nuclear
structures of the
> >>>> two isobar nuclei.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fig.4 and 6 has both the error added in quadrature. So
I have added
> >>>> following sentence:
> >>>> The error bars represent statistical and systematic
uncertainties
> >>>> added in quadrature.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fig.5 has both the systematic and statistical errors
shown
> >>>> separately.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> With Regards,
> >>>> Vipul
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2022-10-14 03:21, Prithwish Tribedy wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Vipul,
> >>>>> Here are my comments on your nice proceedings.
With these
> >>>>> incorporated, I sign off.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Abstract:
> >>>>> "indicating a difference" --> "that is
consistent with the
> >>>>> difference"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "when compared" --> "when comparing" or say
"...between isobar and
> >>>>> ..(other) systems"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 4: "the key observable" --> "one of the key
observables"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 6: "Anisotropic flow is usually refers to"
--> "Such an
> >>>>> observable measures"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 12: "re-scattering" --> "rescatterings"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 14: "during" --> "in"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 16: "data of" --> "data in collisions of
isobars"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 18: "called the" --> "driven by a
phenomenon called the"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 18: "The two isobars" --> "It was realized
that the two
> >>>>> isobars"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 20: "importantly measurement" -->
"importantly, measurements"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 24: You are saying "in heavy-ion collisions"
should you
> >>>>> instead
> >>>>> say "in isobar collisions"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 26: "respect the event" --> "respect to the
event"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 30: "and properties of" --> "and the
properties of"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 32: "proceeding" --> "proceedings"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 41: "shows pT" --> "shows the pT"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 44: "which suggest the formation of the"
--> "which suggests
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> formation of a"
> >>>>> I think this point about "QGP medium in isobar" is
redundant.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 48: Add "v2(pT) of" after "show" & revise
the sentence
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 55: It is not clear what you mean by "2%
within statistical
> >>>>> uncertainties". Are you saying "2% deviation that
statistically
> >>>>> significant". Or, maybe you quote the significance
of the deviation
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> make things clear. Something like "about 6 sigma
for "\Lambdas" but
> >>>>> less than 2 sigma for K_s0". Please make this clear.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fig.4 and below: Somewhere you have to mention that
you're showing
> >>>>> statistical uncertainties only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 56: "which might be effect of different
deformation
> >>>>> parameters"
> >>>>> --> Maybe rephrase it like "consistent with the
difference between
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> nuclear structures of the two isobar nuclei".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 61: "remove effect of" --> "remove the
effect of"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 64: Define NCQ
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 65: "indicate" --> "indicates"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 65: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 66: Remove "process"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 76: "and three" --> "and in three"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 78: "hydrodynamics" --> "hydrodynamic"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 80: "dominate" --> "dominant"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> line 84: "nuclear density for the medium produced"
--> Not clear
> >>>>> what
> >>>>> you mean. Maybe say something like "collision
geometry on
> >>>>> anisotropic
> >>>>> particle production".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Prithwish
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2022-10-10 11:46, vipul via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>>>>> Dear Conveners,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please find below link to the ICHEP-2022
proceedings.
> >>>>>> Please give your comments and suggestions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> With Regards,
> >>>>>> Vipul
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2022-10-10 21:03, webmaster--- via
Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com)
has submitted a
> >>>>>>> material for a
> >>>>>>> review, please have a look:
> >>>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61281
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> If you have any problems with the review
process, please contact
> >>>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>>>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>>>>>>
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>>>>>
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:36:59 +0530
> From: pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> To: pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and
> Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for
> ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
> Message-ID: <30374cdbf8e298cc884117563a73d236 AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Dear Subhash,
> The link to the latest version of the proceeding is
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v3.pdf
> after a small correction in the typo.
>
> Regards,
> Prabhupada
> On 2022-10-17 10:17, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Subhash,
> > Thank you for the comments and suggestion. The corrected version of
> > the proceeding can be found in the link below. Please have a look.
> >
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v2.pdf
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prabhupada
> > On 2022-10-16 09:02, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >> Dear Prabhupada,
> >>
> >> Nice proceedings. I have a few suggestions for your
consideration:
> >>
> >> abstract: add a space between KS0 and Lambda
> >> remove 14.6. You are not showing anything from this energy.
> >> The hydrodynamically motivated ratio ... is presented as a
function of
> >> pT
> >>
> >> line 11: If Psi_n is event plane here, then you need resolution
factor
> >> in equation 2
> >>
> >> line 13: remove initial
> >>
> >> line 16-17: To overcome this problem, --> I don't understand
the
> >> problem here. I think you mean multi-strange hadrons are not
affected
> >> by late stage hadronic rescattering. Could you rephrase the
sentence.
> >>
> >> line 19: You could elaborate/specify on the detector upgrades
and
> >> increase in number of events here.
> >>
> >> line 24-26: I think the "? ? ??????" is the inverse of dN/d?
right.
> >> First define it then say it is used to flaten the event plane.
> >>
> >> line 26-27: Please rephrase it.
> >>
> >> line 28: Add the the eta regions of sub-events?
> >>
> >> line 35: particles and anti-particles --> Mention particle
species
> >> here.
> >>
> >> line 48: define what is modified ncq here
> >>
> >> line 53: this could be due to the effect from transported quarks
> >>
> >> line 61: weak dependence on pT above 1.5 GeV/c
> >>
> >> line 68: because its dominant cause is --> may be due to the
initial
> >> eccentricity ....
> >>
> >> line 70: because its main cause --> because it is expected
from the
> >> event-by-event fluctuation ....
> >>
> >> line 72: which can be attributed to ...
> >>
> >>
> >> I sign off with these addressed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks and regards,
> >> Subhash
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2022-10-11 03:34 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >>>
> >>> Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted
a
> >>> material for a
> >>> review, please have a look:
> >>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61286
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> If you have any problems with the review process, please
contact
> >>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Star-fcv-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 16
> ******************************************
</star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov></pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></ddf6e096ae8dcfa9119ca32dddbdcd65 AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov></subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></cd932d0316916cbe20ea1f36f763b8df AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov></subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov></vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>

Re: [Star-fcv-l] Star-fcv-l Digest, Vol 26, Issue 16, 胡强, 10/17/2022