STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Convenors,
Please let me know if you have any further comments on the latest 
version of the proceedings.

Regards,
Prabhupada
On 2022-10-18 14:49, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Prithwish,
> Thank you for the comments and suggestions. I have modified the draft
> accordingly.
> Link to the corrected version:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v5.pdf
> Ans. to some queries:
> > > line 15: "Therefore, ....model" --> I don't understand this, why do 
> > > we
> > > need to measure v_2 & v_3 simultaneously? It is not clear from this
> > > para.  Which reference says this ? Cite it again at the end of this
> > > sentence. If this is about constructing the ratio v_3/v_2^{3/2} and
> > > therefore you need both -- make it clear here.
> This is from a model paper by Chun Shen
> (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.6350.pdf). But I have to remove this line
> because my page limit is exceeding the 6-page after the corrections.
> So I have to cut some texts.
>
> > > line 27: "= pT x \phi - weight" --> "is applied to take care of the
> > > non-uniform acceptance in pT & \phi".
> I changed the text as follows. Please let me know if this is fine.
> The weight factor $w_{i} = p_{T} \times \phi-\mathrm{weight}$ is
> applied to optimize the resolution and to take care of the non-uniform
> acceptance in $\phi$.
>
> Regards,
> Prabhupada
>
> On 2022-10-18 01:26, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Prabhupada,
> >  You draft is already in a good shape. Here are my comments on the
> > latest version of your proceedings. With these included I sign off.
> >
> > abstract:
> > proceeding --> proceedings or contribution
> >
> > "to the transported quarks effect" --> rephrase like "..contribution
> > from the transported quarks.." (transported quarks effect is not
> > clear)
> >
> > line 2: "collision provides" --> "collisions provide"
> >
> > line 4: Add "the" before final-state & remove "produced from the
> > medium formed in the collision"
> >
> > line 5: "initial state of the medium and its properties" --> "initial
> > stages and hydrodynamic evolution of the medium formed in such
> > collisions"
> >
> > line 8: Comma missing after "Here", "nth" --> the nth", "proxy of" -->
> > "proxy for" & add "(\Psi_R)" after "reaction plane"
> >
> > line 14: Add "quantities characterizing the" before "transport 
> > properties"
> >
> > line 15: "Therefore, ....model" --> I don't understand this, why do we
> > need to measure v_2 & v_3 simultaneously? It is not clear from this
> > para.  Which reference says this ? Cite it again at the end of this
> > sentence. If this is about constructing the ratio v_3/v_2^{3/2} and
> > therefore you need both -- make it clear here.
> >
> > line 18: Remove "so" and start a new sentence. Remove "the" before 
> > "least".
> >
> > line 19: "considered excelled" --> "considered as excellent"
> >
> > line 19 and everywhere: "initial stage" --> "initial stages" & revise
> > the sentence accordingly.
> >
> > line 19: "In BES-II" --> "During the RHIC BES-II program"
> >
> > line 20: "better dE/dx" --> "extended pseudorapidity capabilities,
> > better particle identification"
> >
> > line 22: "The collision event statistics" --> "The statistics of the
> > event sample". "at 19.6 GeV" --> "for Au+Au collisions at √sNN=19.6
> > GeV".
> >
> > line 23: "precise" --> "more precise"
> >
> > line 27: "= pT x \phi - weight" --> "is applied to take care of the
> > non-uniform acceptance in pT & \phi".
> >
> > line 28: "factor" --> "factors for", "is the" --> "is obtained from 
> > the"
> >
> > line 29: "Details on" --> "The details of". "\phi-weight can" -->
> > "\phi-weight estimation can". "in [5]" --> "in Ref. [5]" (optional
> > comment)
> >
> > line 31: "with \eta" --> "of \eta". Also, "hemispheres" is not a good
> > choice here but I don't have any good alternatives in my mind. Maybe
> > "sides".
> >
> > line 32, 47: Avoid starting sentence with symbols except for the
> > captions (optional comment). Add "Here".
> >
> > line 33: Do you have a reference for "The...BES-I measurement"? If not
> > and this is from your analysis then say "We find..."
> >
> > line 53 & everywhere: "ncq" --> "NCQ". Add "i.e." after "v3" on this 
> > line.
> >
> > line 54: remove comma (,) after energy.
> >
> > Line 60-62: This is the first time you talk about 14.6 GeV data
> > without any reference. It reads a bit awkward as you didn't allude
> > briefly in the earlier sections of this proceedings. Therefore, please
> > add a sentence in line 60 before you talk about 14.6 GeV data "In STAR
> > collaboration, we have also analyzed 14.6 GeV data from BES-II program
> > (results not shown here)". Also, cite a reference or a document if you
> > can.
> >
> > line 64: I think you need a hyphen (-) between "hydrodynamics &
> > motivated". Also, add "of v3/v_2^(3/2)" before "ratio".
> >
> > line 66 & other places: "weak" --> "a weak"
> >
> > Figure captions: "centrality events" --> "centrality classes" or
> > "centrality selections"
> >
> > line 72: "internal degrees of freedom" add "valence" here or say
> > "valance quark content" to be more clear.
> >
> > line 74: "may be due to the initial eccentricity in the colliding
> > system" --> "driven by the centrality dependence of initial
> > ellipticity"
> >
> > line 75: "expected from the event-by-event fluctuation" --> "expected
> > to driven by initial state fluctuations". This is better as this
> > includes nucleon, sub-nucleon, e-by-e geometry that lead to v_3.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2022-10-17 01:06, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear Subhash,
> > > The link to the latest version of the proceeding is
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v3.pdf
> > > after a small correction in the typo.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Prabhupada
> > > On 2022-10-17 10:17, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Dear Subhash,
> > > > Thank you for the comments and suggestion. The corrected version of
> > > > the proceeding can be found in the link below. Please have a look.
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ICHEP_proceedings_v2.pdf
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Prabhupada
> > > > On 2022-10-16 09:02, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > Dear Prabhupada,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nice proceedings. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:
> > > > >
> > > > > abstract: add a space between KS0 and Lambda
> > > > > remove 14.6. You are not showing anything from this energy.
> > > > > The hydrodynamically motivated ratio ... is presented as a function 
> > > > > of pT
> > > > >
> > > > > line 11: If Psi_n is event plane here, then you need resolution 
> > > > > factor
> > > > > in equation 2
> > > > >
> > > > > line 13: remove initial
> > > > >
> > > > > line 16-17: To overcome this problem, --> I don't understand the
> > > > > problem here. I think you mean multi-strange hadrons are not 
> > > > > affected
> > > > > by late stage hadronic rescattering. Could you rephrase the 
> > > > > sentence.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 19: You could elaborate/specify on the detector upgrades and
> > > > > increase in number of events here.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 24-26: I think the "𝜙 − 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡" is the inverse of dN/d𝜙 right.
> > > > > First define it then say it is used to flaten the event plane.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 26-27: Please rephrase it.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 28: Add the the eta regions of sub-events?
> > > > >
> > > > > line 35:  particles and anti-particles --> Mention particle species 
> > > > > here.
> > > > >
> > > > > line 48: define what is modified ncq here
> > > > >
> > > > > line 53: this could be due to the effect from transported quarks
> > > > >
> > > > > line 61: weak dependence on pT above 1.5 GeV/c
> > > > >
> > > > > line 68: because its dominant cause is --> may be due to the 
> > > > > initial
> > > > > eccentricity  ....
> > > > >
> > > > > line 70:  because its main cause -->  because it is expected from 
> > > > > the
> > > > > event-by-event fluctuation ....
> > > > >
> > > > > line 72: which can be attributed to ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I sign off with these addressed.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and regards,
> > > > > Subhash
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2022-10-11 03:34 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a 
> > > > > > material for a
> > > > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61286
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l