Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Charles Robertson for DNP 2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Charles Robertson for DNP 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:59:25 -0400

Dear CWR,
Nice slides. Here are my comments. With these included I sign off your talk.

slide#1: I guess you are going to change the date of "Oct 5,2022". Add "Supported in part by" above the DOE logo.

slide#3: "B field and J aligned" --> "B field and J are aligned"

slide#3: "second order reaction plane" --> "reaction plane"

slide#3: "Phenomenologically" is not the correct choice here. How about "The azimuthal distribution of produced particles"

slide#4: "normalizing for multiplicit" --> "normalizing with multiplicity" (I guess)

slide#5: Above the two equations write something like "Two different ways of normalization"

slide#6: In this figure and the others change "Errors are statistical" --> "Statistical uncertainties only"

slide#6: \xi is not defined anywhere. Please clearly define it on this slide and I suggest you quote the expression on other slides as well.

slide#6: "Average \Delta S" --> "Averaging \Delta S between two sub-event", "autocorrelation, This is" --> "autocorrelation that is"

Below the two sub-bullets you have to remind again that in your new approach the \Delta S in two sub-events are treated separately.

slide#7: Add a statement, something like "Separate \Delta S and different treatments of normalization affect the correlation between \Xi and N\Delta\gamma". It would also be good to say that it motivates your ESE analysis.

slide#9: Specify the kinematics for "q_2" estimation.

slide#10: Add a conclusion line here on this slide.

slide#11: I think you should add a general line on the top like "We propose modifications to the R-observable developed for CME search"

slide#11: I think "In previous analysis" before "STAR data" would help.

slide#11: Add "redefined width of the R-observable" or something like that after \Xi.

Best,
Prithwish



On 2022-10-13 10:48, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Charles Robertson (rober558 AT purdue.edu) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61312

Deadline: 2022-10-27
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page