Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for IS 2023 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Shengli Huang <shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for IS 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:51:09 +0530

Dear Shengli,

Nice abstract. I have a few wording suggestions for your consideration:

either "evolves in the collisions of small-size systems" or, "evolves in the small collision systems"

"the uncertainties in the description of initial geometry ...."

"collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV in STAR."

"With the advantage of wide rapidity coverage of the Time Projection Chamber (-1< η <1), the flow coefficients are extracted via di-hadron correlations at mid-pseudorapidity and ..."

"The kinematics of our measurements can help avoid decorrelation and provide a benchmark to compare with boost-invariant models."

"on the initial geometry in small collision systems."

I sign off with these addressed.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2023-02-28 01:10 AM, Shengli Huang via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Prithwish,
Thanks for the comments. I update the abstract with your comments.

Thanks
Shengli

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:32 PM Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Shengli,
Nice abstract. Here are my comments. With these included, I
sign-off
your talk.

heavy ion --> heavy-ion
uncertaities --> uncertainties

This sentence may require some revising:
"of initial geometry due to the internal nucleonic structure and
its fluctuations"
How about:
"associated with the description of initial geometry and
fluctuations at
the sub-nucleonic scale"

"final measurements" --> "measurements"

"coverage of" --> "coverage of the"

"both in the mid-rapidity and" --> "at mid-rapidity using a relative

pseudorapidity separation of"

"It will avoid" --> "The kinematics of our measurements help avoid"

"dynamics contribution" --> "decorrelation"

"nucleonic or sub-nucleonic" --> "nucleonic vs. sub-nucleonic (?)"

Best,
Prithwish

On 2023-02-27 07:28, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Shengli Huang (shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a
material
for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/62823

Deadline: 2023-03-10
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page