STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[gyan <gyan AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Subhash,

Thanks for your suggestions and comments. I already added them to my new 
version. You can find it in same link.

I want to explain s#12, our conclusion is clear collision energy 
dependence between 54 and 27GeV, only 19.6GeV has a larger systematical 
uncertainty. We used more corrections to improve uncertainty, you can 
find my updated result at Collaboration Meeting slides from Page 4 to 
Page 8: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/20220914_collaboration_meeting.pdf

Best regards,
Gaoguo Yan

在 2023-04-20 16:27，webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l 写道：
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a material
> originally submitted by Gaoguo Yan ( gaoguo.yan AT Outlook.com ) at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ATHIC-2023/Longitudinal-De-correlation-Anisotropic-Flow-RHIC-STAR-0
>
> Comment:
> Dear Gaoguo, Nice slides. It seems I Drupal missed your email. Sorry 
> about
> that. I am signing off and sending your contribution to star-talks with 
> a few
> minor comments:
>
> s#6: Can you please check the formatting of the figures, In my screen I 
> see
> some additional boarder lines around the figures.
>
> Beam Energy Scans --> Beam Energy Scan
>
> s#7: Better event plane resolution
>
> s#12: Clear energy dependence --> Indication of energy dependence
> I think hard to conclude on energy dependence considering error bars.
>
> s#13:
> Do you mean  "...between forward and backward directions"?
>
> Longitudinal de-correlation in smaller collisions system is expected to 
> be
> larger
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l