STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material originally 
 
submitted by Aditya Prasad Dash ( adityaprasaddash55 AT gmail.com ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Exploring-Electromagnetic-Field-Effects-Charge-Dependent-Directed-Fl

Comment:
Nice abstract! Please consider the following suggestions to prepare a  
modified version of your talk:

"The Faraday+Coulomb effects in heavy-ion collisions have been recently  
observed at STAR." -->
"STAR has recently reported observations consistent with the presence of  
Faraday+Coulomb effects in heavy-ion collisions.",,,

"which manifest a negative ∆v1, i.e., the difference" -->
"Such effects are predicted to results in a negative ∆v1, defined by the  
difference",,,

"within a rapidity window of (−1, 1), as a function of rapidity"-->
"as a function of rapidity in the window of $-1<y<1$ ",,,

"Furthermore, the measurements at √sNN = 7.7 GeV provide enlightening  
insights into the role of electromagnetic fields in the system evolution,  
when hadronic interactions dominate over the partonic ones." -->
"Additionally, by extending our measurements to as low as √sNN = 7.7 GeV,  
we have the exciting opportunity to gain insights into the role of  
electromagnetic fields in the evolution of the system, particularly when  
hadronic interactions begin to dominate over partonic interactions.",,,

Additional points:
     The observation of smaller negative values of kaon splitting compared to 
 
proton was consistent with the Hall effect even in peripheral events.  
However, the abstract only mentions Faraday+Coulomb effects. It would be  
better to start the abstract with the combined effect of Faraday+Coulomb and  
Hall effects, such as "STAR has recently reported observations consistent  
with the presence of Faraday+Coulomb and Hall effects in heavy-ion  
collisions.",,,

     Regarding the statement "as well as a stronger effect with increasing  
pT," we look forward to seeing the promised pt dependence along with data for 
 
other energies in the future. We are particularly interested in seeing the  
<pT> vs centrality of various PID as discussed at the collaboration  
meeting.,,,

    We also look forward to the presentation of data for other energies (14.6 
 
and 7.7) at future PWG meetings.,,,

     Additionally, we believe it would be helpful to take a look at the 
Lambda  
results (not part of your abstract) to enhance our understanding of the  
phenomenon, as it has been a recurring theme. We hope these suggestions will  
be addressed in future studies.


---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov