Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Cameron Racz for AUM 2023 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Cameron Racz <cracz001 AT ucr.edu>
  • To: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Cameron Racz for AUM 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:28:19 -0500

Hi Subhash,

I have just uploaded another version of the slides with changes to slide 4
images for clarity, and minor text changes on the last bullets of both slides
2 and 9.

Cameron Racz
Ph.D. Candidate
Heavy-ion Physics Group
University of California, Riverside






> On Jul 31, 2023, at 12:29 PM, Cameron Racz <cracz001 AT ucr.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Subhash,
>
> Thank you for the great comments, I have made the changes and uploaded the
> new version 2 of my slides.
>
> Cameron Racz
> Ph.D. Candidate
> Heavy-ion Physics Group
> University of California, Riverside
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 2023, at 12:04 AM, subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Cameron,
>>
>> Very nice and comprehensive slides. I have a few comments below for your
>> consideration:
>>
>> s#2: "Sign change in dv1/dy is a signal for 1st-order phase transition.".
>> It is a strong statement and model dependent, you can soften it, e.g Sign
>> of dv1/dy is sensitive to 1st-order phase transition
>>
>> s#3: "Opportunity to get a complete picture of flow observables across the
>> phase transition." --> I would suggest, Opportunity to probe the QCD phase
>> diagram through flow observables.
>> or, you can rephrase accordingly.
>> You can probably remove "Many energies to be used to"
>>
>> s#4: I think this slide is not necessary. You can consider removing it.
>>
>> s#9: You are comparing two different beam energies and you want to say the
>> v2, v3 ordering is same, which is fine.
>> "v3 < 0.1 up to pT ∼ 3 GeV/c" --> I am not sure I understand what do you
>> want mean here?
>>
>> s#14,15: In the title you can mention beam energy, like you are doing for
>> all other slides.
>>
>> s#15: You are focussing on light nuclei. May be you can mention "light
>> nuclei" in the title
>>
>> s#16: 27 GeV (2019) is also part of BES-II
>>
>> s#18: Replace the figure with the version from arXiv. In this paper the v1
>> splitting also increases with _Delta_S_. You should mention this important
>> feature.
>>
>> ps: For completeness, you could also mention there is companion paper
>> 2304.03430 observed v1 splitting for light hadrons.
>>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Subhash
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2023-07-31 05:26 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>> Cameron Racz (cracz001 AT ucr.edu) has submitted a material for a review,
>>> please
>>> have a look:
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64457
>>> Deadline: 2023-08-01
>>> ---
>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page