star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review
- From: sharangrav <sharangrav AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:31:05 +0530
Dear Subhash,
Please let me know if you have any further comments.
Thanks and regards,
Sharang
On 2023-08-17 16:26, sharangrav via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Subhash,
Thanks for the valuable suggestions. I have updated the slides and
here is the link to the same:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64502
You are right about v3^odd of deuteron. It is not the part of current
3 GeV paper. This is first time we are observing it in our analysis.
Thanks and regards,
Sharang Rav Sharma
On 2023-08-17 12:39, subhash wrote:
Dear Sharang,_______________________________________________
Thanks for considering my suggestions.
I would suggest to mention in respective slides if v1 fit functions
and/or pt-acceptance are different between different data sets,
especially for published vs. preliminary slides s#15, 17, 19, 22, 24.
s#23: I already asked this. Do you know why the sign of p and d are
different for 3.9 GeV?
My recollection is that we never presented v3^odd of deuteron outside
(and also not part of current 3 GeV v3^odd paper) because we don't
understand the difference between them.
A few minor edits:
s#15: title you could add (pi, K, p)
s#17: similarly net p and net K in title
s#19: title (p, d, t)
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2023-08-16 02:13 AM, sharangrav wrote:
Dear Subhash,
Thank you for your nice comments and suggestions. I have incorporated
your suggestion in my presentation slides and here is the link to my
updated slides:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64502
Here are some of the explanations to your comments:
s#15: Are the pt-acceptance and v1 fit function same for published and
this analysis?
The pT acceptance is the same. The fit function for collider energies
was 1st order polynomial. In published 3 GeV (FXT) and my analysis 3rd
order polynomial is implemented (1st order polynomials is incorporated
in systematics)
s#17: same question as above, is the pt-acceptance same? Visually,
your net-p points doesn't seem to be smooth as function sNN!
The pT acceptance is the same. The fit function for collider energies
was 1st order polynomial. In my analysis 3rd order polynomial is
implemented (1st order polynomials is incorporated in systematics)
s#22: What is the pt-acceptance of HADES?
pT for HADES: [1 - 1.5 GeV/c]
s#23: On the coalescence point of view, how do we understand different
sign of v3^odd for p and d?
Within systematics the slope for scaled v3 (d(v3/A)/dy) for both
proton and deuteron seems consistent with each other
Please let me know if you have any further comments.
Thanks and regards,
Sharang Rav Sharma
On 2023-08-14 16:16, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Sharang,
Nice presentation. I have a few question and suggestions for your consideration:
In general: when presenting dvn/dy and comparing different data, it
would be good to indicate whether the pt-acceptance is same or not. I
have indicated specific slide numbers below.
s#4: minimum in v1 --> minimum in baryon's dv1/dy sensitive to softening of EoS
s#5: Correct the typo: 3.2,
s#7 or 8: you could indicate the sub-events eta ranges used for
resolution calculation
s#9: You could indicate the beam energy in figure panel
Although you have mentioned, a line/box in the 2D plots indicating the
acceptance used would be helpful.
s#15: Are the pt-acceptance and v1 fit function same for published and
this analysis?
s#17: same question as above, is the pt-acceptance same? Visually,
your net-p points doesn't seem to be smooth as function sNN!
I would suggest to remove bullet "signature of first-order phase
transition" here. Also I would not say "Similar trend is observed for
net-kaon". Important observation is that the turn-over of net-p and
net-K seems to be at different energy. BTW, do you have any
explanation for this observation?
s#21: Weak rapidity dependence is not true for protons especially at
3.2 GeV. Please rephrase bullets according to particle species.
s#22: What is the pt-acceptance of HADES?
s#23: On the coalescence point of view, how do we understand different
sign of v3^odd for p and d?
s#24: Is it possible to add the EoS model lines on s#4 rightmost plot
here in this plot?
s#25: Since you are doing A-scaling for p and d with both v1^odd and
v3^odd, can you make a statement on coalescence mechanism?
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2023-08-07 06:46 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,_______________________________________________
Sharang Rav Sharma (sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has submitted a
material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64502
Deadline: 2023-08-21
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 08/07/2023
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review, webmaster, 08/07/2023
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 08/07/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 08/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/15/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review, sharangrav, 08/16/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 08/17/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/17/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/17/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review, sharangrav, 08/18/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/17/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/17/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
sharangrav, 08/15/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 08/14/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.