star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- From: Takafumi Niida <niida AT bnl.gov>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 21:15:13 +0900
Dear Niseem,
I’m asked by STAR management to have a look at a few posters including yours.
Please find my comments to your nice poster for your consideration.
Abstract:
- its weak -> their weak
- "constraints on the theoretical calculations' initial conditions and medium
properties” I would remove “theoretical calculations’ “.
Motivation:
- Gives -> Give
- the heavy ion collisions’ initial state -> the initial state in heavy-ion
collisions
Analysis method
- “… four Event plane…” -> “… four event plane…”
- The table can be omitted and replaced with one sentence like “Two subevents
for two, three, four particle cumulants and full-event for higher orders”. It
would be more useful if you write definitions of SC(n,m) and NSC(n,m)
explicitly here or “Flow harmonics correlations” section.
- “Summary of the methods used in these measurements” Not sure if this is
needed.
Event plane angular correlations
- “Comparison of the three-, four-, five- and six-event plan”: The last part
should be "six-order event plane”.
As you also show psi1-psi2 correlation, probably better to say “Comparison of
nth-order event plane angular correlations vs centrality”.
- Can you define \rho_{n1,n2} and \rho_{n1,n2,n3}?
- “The rho_{2,4} and rho_{2,3} show similar values…” rho_{2,3} is almost zero…
- “Except for rho_{2,6}…” Looks interesting. Do you have any naive
explanation?
- “…less than the initial state’s” -> “…less than that from the initial state”
- For the legend of the left 6-panel plot, consider to add extra line (space)
between “AMPT Au+Au 200 GeV” and “Au+Au 200 GeV” or perhaps to change “Au+Au
200 GeV” to “Data Au+Au 200 GeV”, so that it’s easier to see what are data
and what is model.
- "expected to reduce the GMC effect” Do you mean “less affected by GMC”?
Also spell out GMC when it appears for the first time.
Flow harmonics correlations
- "… six-particles...” -> “… six-particle…”
- “vs. Centrality” -> “vs. centrality”
- Can you say something about the energy dependence since you show many data
in NSC?
Conclusion
- show -> shows (in two places)
- (Anti) -> (anti)
Best regards,
Takafumi
> On Aug 22, 2023, at 23:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com) has submitted a
>
> material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64808
>
> Deadline: 2023-09-03
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 08/22/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Takafumi Niida, 08/25/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.