STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[xgou <xgou AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Sooraj,

Thanks for your nice comments.

Reply to S7: A strong magnetic field will be generated in non-central 
heavy ion collisions, and the magnetic field will enhance the antiLambda 
polarization and depress the Lambda polarization due to the opposite 
magnetic moment, which will lead to the splitting between Lambda and 
AntiLambda polarization. Therefore it is very important to compare 
Lambda-AntiLambda polarization together.

Reply to S10: When I talk about this page of slides, I will briefly 
introduce Local polarization.

Reply to S15: This is not the ideal hydro results, the calculations are 
from the model results based on the hydro scenario from s13(yellow line 
and green line).

Reply to s17: At present, we cannot conclude that the data does not 
support SHE, because the current data significance is not enough (< 2 
sigma).

Reply to s6,s18: I have update the slides with your suggestions.

Thank you very much, please find the update version in the same 
link:https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64832


Best regards,
Xingrui

> Hi Xingrui,
>    Nice results and very well put together slides. I have a few minor
> comments, please find below
>
> S6: Please use a more recent version with iTPC, EPD and ETOF
> S7: What are the predictions for the difference? Does it make sense to
> have them in the figure to compare?
> S10: Could give a brief introduction to local polarization
> S15: Is it ideal hydro used in the claculations?
> S17: With two energies, can we conclude no SHE is favored by data?
> What is the significance of the deviation from curve with SHE?
> S18: Instead of listing by topics, you could directly highlight the
> main conclusion from each, like no splitting between Lambd and Lambda
> bar, no system size dependence etc
>
> Best,
> Sooraj
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:30 AM subhash via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Dear Xingrui,
> >
> > Very nice slides. I have only a few suggestions for your
> > consideration:
> >
> > Please try unifying the style of reference eg PRL vs Phys Rev Lett
> > across slides.
> >
> > s#7: Add a space 27GeV in title
> > 1st bullet: about 10 times increase in statistics
> >
> > 4th bullet: upper limit on late stage Magnetic field
> >
> > s#9: Please consider adding a reference for model
> >
> > s#15: "Local polarization pT dependence" is repeated in three
> > consecutive bullets, you can consider a re-phrase.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Subhash
> >
> > On 2023-08-23 09:53 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Xingrui Gou (Gouxr AT sdu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > > please
> > > have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64832
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> --
>
> Sooraj Radhakrishnan
>
> Research Scientist,
> Department of Physics
>
> Kent State University
>  Kent, OH 44243
>
> Physicist Postdoctoral AffiliateNuclear Science Division
> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
> Berkeley, CA 94720
> Ph: 510-495-2473 [1]
>
> Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] tel:%28510%29%20495-2473
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l