STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Prabhupada,

Thanks for the updated slides.

On 2023-09-28 03:36 PM, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
> > > s#4: # of accepted events or good events; Please also mention your 
> > > vertex
> > > selections; There are other analysis using wider vertex selection 
> > > reports a
> > > different # of events at these energies;
> These are the accepted events (Events after analysis cuts). I have
> mentioned the Vz cut in the slide.

Recently, I encountered that analysis in LFSUPC-group reported 450M 
events for 14.6 GeV with similar vz-cut. Am I missing anything?
See here: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/fang_strangeness_0814_0.pdf

> > > s#5: resolution formula should be different, right? strictly you are 
> > > not
> > > calculating it simply by sqrt<cos (a-b)>;
> R(sub) = sqrt<cos (a-b)> is the sub-event plane resolution. vn is
> calculated using sub-event plane method so sub-event resolution is
> used for correction. Are you referring the formula for full event
> plane resolution?

BTW, what I mean how do you get the resolution values, are you using the 
Bessel function or taking the approximation?
https://arxiv.org/pdf/nucl-ex/9805001.pdf, equation -11

> > > s#12,13: We have a clear breaking of NCQ at 3.2 GeV; It may be 
> > > mentioned or
> > > the recent QM2023 preliminary plot may be added for completeness;
> I have added the information in the slide. Please have a look.
> > > s#13: You start with a motivation about phi meson NCQ scaling 
> > > breaking below
> > > 19.6 GeV in BES-I; I think you can emphasize that \phi participated 
> > > in
> > > scaling up to 14.6 GeV as a sub-bullet;
> Added the point.
> All other comments are also implemented.
> updated slide: 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DQCD_v2.pdf
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Prabhupada
>
>
>
> On 2023-09-28 11:54, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a 
> > material
> > originally submitted by Prabhupada Dixit ( prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in 
> > ) at
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Dynamics-QCD-2023/Azimuthal-anisotropic-flow-identified-hadrons-Au-Au-collisions-BES-I
> >
> > Comment:
> > Dear Prabhupada,
> >
> > Nice slides. I sign off with a few comments:
> >
> > Style of referring can be unified, eg s#3 is different than others;
> > s#2: reference to flow paper can be included; If Psi_n is event plane, 
> > then
> > there will be a resolution factor;
> > s#4: # of accepted events or good events; Please also mention your 
> > vertex
> > selections; There are other analysis using wider vertex selection 
> > reports a
> > different # of events at these energies;
> > s#5: resolution formula should be different, right? strictly you are 
> > not
> > calculating it simply by sqrt<cos (a-b)>;
> > s#6: If the v_2 is not corrected for resolution, it should be 
> > v_2^observed;
> > s#12,13: We have a clear breaking of NCQ at 3.2 GeV; It may be 
> > mentioned or
> > the recent QM2023 preliminary plot may be added for completeness;
> > s#13: You start with a motivation about phi meson NCQ scaling breaking 
> > below
> > 19.6 GeV in BES-I; I think you can emphasize that \phi participated in
> > scaling up to 14.6 GeV as a sub-bullet;
> >
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l