STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Vipul,

Nicely written proceedings. I sign off with a few suggestions:

abstract:
although you defined above, I suggest: among isobar, Cu+Cu, Au+Au... --> 
among Ru+Ru, Zr+Zr, Cu+Cu, Au+Au ..

Introduction 2nd para:
I would suggest to adding a sentence referring CME related blind 
analysis as one of the main motivation for RHIC isobar run.

Dataset and analysis methods::
In this proceeding --> In these proceedings

3.4 Model comparison:
"The colliding nuclei in AMPT are modeled according to the Wood-Saxon 
distribution function. The parameter characterizes the deformation of 
the nucleus," --> I would suggest: The colliding nuclei in AMPT are 
modeled according to a deformed Wood-Saxon distribution with nuclear 
radius given by,

4 Summary:
"AMPT-SM model with and without nuclear deformation describes well the 
data in the measured pT range for minimum-bias isobar collisions at √sNN 
=200 GeV" --> I suggest: The AMPT-SM model, with and without nuclear 
deformation, provides a good description of the data within the measured 
pT range for minimum-bias isobar collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV.


Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2023-10-28 11:26 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for 
> a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65746
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l