STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material originally 
 
submitted by Zhiwan Xu ( zhiwanxu AT physics.ucla.edu ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/DNPJPS-2023/DNP-talk-Search-CME-BES-II-data-STAR

Comment:
Nice Slide! With these following comments I approve the talk.
Slide#4: "STAR Isobar" --> "Isobar collisions" //
Slide#4: Remove "Fraction of CME signal is likely not as large in Au+Au" //
Slide#5: "by categorize" --> "by categorizing" //
Slide#5: "Why Search for the CME at Au+Au Beam Energy Scan?" -->"Why Search  
for the CME with Au+Au Beam Energy Scan?" //
Slide#5: "We should focus on lower energy" --> "Prerequisites for CME changes 
 
with energy" //
Slide#5: "Possible to see the turn-off effect near 7.7 GeV or lower (where  
QGP is about to vanish)" --> "Possible to see the turn-off effect where QGP  
signatures vanishes" //
Slide#6: "long ranged" --> "long range" //
Slide#8: "by product of" --> "by the relation" //
Slide#8: "However, ....sensitive to CME" --> "AVFD calculations show...  
sensitive to input CME signal" //
Slide#8: "CME existence" --> "presence of CME" //
Slide#9: "AVFD proves" --> "AVFD demonstrates" //
Slide#12: This is history slide, it would be good mention the previous BES-II 
 
measurements at 27 GeV //
Slide#16: "3\sigma significance" --> "3\sigma significance of CME sensitive  
\Delta\gamma_{ESS}
Slide#16: "uncertainties too large to conclude" --> "uncertainties dominate"
Slide#17: "and nonflow supression with \Psi_1" --> "and nonflow supression  
with \Psi_1 obtained Delta\gamma_{ESS}/\Delta\gamma is a measure of the upper 
 
limit of CME fraction that shows"
Slide#18: Makes sure bullet 3 is correct. What has 3\sigma?  
\Delta\gamma_{ESS} or \Delta\gamma_{ESS}/\Delta\gamma ?

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov