Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: sharangrav <sharangrav AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, 陈震宇 <zhenyuchen AT sdu.edu.cn>, Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Sharang Rav Sharma for ISMD 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:01:21 +0530

Dear Subhash,

A gentle reminder for your further comments on my proceedings.
Here is the link to updated version: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043
The deadline for the same is 30th November. Apologies for the inconvenience.

Thanks and regards,
Sharang

On 2023-11-23 23:20, sharangrav via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Subhash,

Thanks for your nice comments. I have incorporated all of them in the
updated version and here is the link to the same.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043
Please le me know if you have further comments.

Thanks and regards,
Sharang

On 2023-11-22 18:47, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Sharang,

Nice proceedings. I have a few suggestions below for your consideration:

l#10: at s_NN = 3.2, ...

l#11, 12: for identified hadrons (pi, K, p) and net-particles (net K
and net p) ....

l#13, 14: The minimum in v1 slope for net-kaon is observed at lower
collision energy than net-proton
--> I think we don't have sufficient data to comment about the
minimum. You can probably say that the sign change occurred at
different energy.

l#18: "The v3 slope for all particles decreases in magnitude with
increasing collision energy, indicating the effect of the mean-field
at the low energies."
--> How mean field connected to energy dependence, can you explain?
There could be multiple effects folded in here mean-field, baryon
stopping, geometry, ... right?

l#51, 55 and else where add a space X ~ GeV

l#59: remove bracket on \kappa

l#61,62: add a reference

l#66: The traditional v3, ...

l#77: In these proceedings,

l#88-93: You could mention the kinematics, pt, eta selections and
track selection conditions before introducing particle identification.

l#93: I guess you are not using z-variable for all species, only for
light nuclei. For other species you are using combination with Nsigma.
So modify the discussions accordingly.

l#113: You could mention what is used as weight in Q reconstruction

l#130: employed in the collider BES-I

l#141, 142: you can add model comparison or a reference for backing up
the statement

l#155: linear term in a third-order polynomial, right?

l#160: Suggest to change the statement that we observe a sign change
than observe a minima, as mentioned above. Also make a similar change
in the conclusion.

l#172, 173: modify the statement that it is not solely from
mean-field. Also make a similar change in the conclusion.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash




On 2023-11-20 01:44 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Sharang Rav Sharma (sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has submitted a
material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page