star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- From: "Zuowen Liu" <liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>
- To: "subhash" <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Cc: "star-fcv-l" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:20:23 +0800
Dear Subhash,
Thanks a lot for your nice suggestions.
I have implemented all of them into the proceeding.
For the typos, I checked again and fixed them.
Kindly find the updated proceeding by the link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/qm23proceeding_Zuowen.pdf
Thanks again for your great help.
Best regards,
Zuowen
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "subhash"<subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
Date: Wed, Nov 29, 2023 04:47 PM
To: "Zuowen Liu"<liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>;
Cc: "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
Dear Zuowen,
Nice proceedings. Please consider running a latex spell checker to spot
the typos. In general, at several places sentences are not formatted
properly. I tried to correct. Please get it proof read by a colleague in
your group to check if my interpretations are proper. The followings are
a few suggestions for your consideration:
l#1: you may consider adding "at RHIC" for completeness
l#5: In this proceeding, --> In these proceedings,
l#5,6: may be: transverse momentum dependence of the rapidity slope of
directed flow (dv1/dy|y=0) for π+ and K0S in Au+Au ... and 3.9 GeV.
l#7: Both π+ and K0S show negative
l#8: "spectator shadowing could result in anti-flow at low pT "
--> spectator shadowing may lead to anti-flow at low pT.
"Furthermore, Number of Constitute Quark (NCQ) scaling of v2 at √ sNN =
3.2 GeV was observed which is completely broken"
--->
Furthermore, we observe a complete breaking of Number of Constitute
Quark (NCQ) scaling of elliptic flow (v2) at √sNN = 3.2 GeV.
It implies that the dominance of hadronic degrees of freedom occurs at
√sNN = 3.2 GeV and below.
l#12: At last, --> Finally,
"and physical implications are discussed."
--> and the implications in the context of highly dense baryonic matter
are discussed.
l#16: In this contribution, we present the most recent measurements ...
in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 3.0 - 3.9 GeV in STAR Fixed Target mode
l#18: For identification of π±, K±, and p, a combination of Time
Projection Chamber (TPC) and Time of Flight (TOF) is used
l#20-23: Suggest:
The left panel of Fig. 1 illustrates the rigidity (p/q: particle
momentum divided by charge) dependence of ionization energy loss (dE/dx)
in the TPC. The dashed line represents the theoretical ionization energy
loss curve for particles passing through the TPC. Particle
identification by TOF is based on the particle mass square (m^2)
distribution, which can be obtained from the particle velocity (β).
l#24-26: suggestion:
Moreover, the Kalman Filter (KF) particle package [3], where the
covariance matrix of reconstructed tracks is taken into account, is
employed to reconstruct weak decay particles (KS0 and Lambda).
l#26-28: suggestion:
An example of reconstructing the invariant mass using the KF particle
package is demonstrated with the KS0 meson in the right panel of Fig. 1.
l#30: kaon --> Kaon
l#31-33:
The anti-flow of kaons was first observed ..... 6 A GeV. It was
attributed to the repulsive potential associated with the strange quark
in K0S.
l#33-36: suggestion:
We have observed anti-flow behavior in kaons and pions for pT < 0.6
GeV/c in mid-central Au + Au collisions at 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, and 3.9 GeV
using the fixed target data from STAR.
l#37-43: suggestion:
The hadronic transport model JAM [5] calculations are compared with
experimental data at 3.9 GeV. The JAM model in hadronic cascade mode
(blue band) can successfully capture the anti-flow pattern at low pT for
π+ and K0S, even without the inclusion of a kaon potential [4]. However,
the JAM model with baryonic mean field (red band) tends to overestimate
the v1 slope for π+ and K0S. Additionally, the JAM mean field without
spectator contribution (black band) exhibits a larger v1 slope compared
to the one with spectators. The data-model comparisons above suggest
that the shadowing effect [6] from the spectator may also play a
significant role in generating anti-flow at low pT.
l#45-48: suggestion
The left and right panels of Fig. 3 illustrate the number of constituent
quarks (nq) scaled elliptic flow (v2/nq) as a function of transverse
kinetic energy ((mT − m0)/nq) for particles (π+, K+, K0S, p, and Λ) and
antiparticles (π−, K−, and K0S), respectively.
l#48-52: please re-format to clarify the sentence.
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2023-11-25 12:05 PM, Zuowen Liu wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Kindly find the updated proceeding by the link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65884
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Zuowen
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
>
> From: "Zuowen Liu"<liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>;
> Date: Fri, Nov 24, 2023 04:41 PM
> To: "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Cc: "subhash"<subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark
> Matter 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Thank you for the kind reminder.
> I would short it to four.
>
> Best regards,
> Zuowen
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
>
> From: "subhash via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Date: Wed, Nov 22, 2023 04:15 PM
> To: "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Cc: "subhash"<subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark
> Matter 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Zuowen,
>
> Thanks for posting your proceedings.
> I guess there are page limits on the proceedings. It supposed to be
> 4-page including references, you have 5-pages now.
> Can you please check and shorten it to fit the limit.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2023-11-10 05:14 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Zuowen Liu (liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65884
>>
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Nice proceedings. Please consider running a latex spell checker to spot
the typos. In general, at several places sentences are not formatted
properly. I tried to correct. Please get it proof read by a colleague in
your group to check if my interpretations are proper. The followings are
a few suggestions for your consideration:
l#1: you may consider adding "at RHIC" for completeness
l#5: In this proceeding, --> In these proceedings,
l#5,6: may be: transverse momentum dependence of the rapidity slope of
directed flow (dv1/dy|y=0) for π+ and K0S in Au+Au ... and 3.9 GeV.
l#7: Both π+ and K0S show negative
l#8: "spectator shadowing could result in anti-flow at low pT "
--> spectator shadowing may lead to anti-flow at low pT.
"Furthermore, Number of Constitute Quark (NCQ) scaling of v2 at √ sNN =
3.2 GeV was observed which is completely broken"
--->
Furthermore, we observe a complete breaking of Number of Constitute
Quark (NCQ) scaling of elliptic flow (v2) at √sNN = 3.2 GeV.
It implies that the dominance of hadronic degrees of freedom occurs at
√sNN = 3.2 GeV and below.
l#12: At last, --> Finally,
"and physical implications are discussed."
--> and the implications in the context of highly dense baryonic matter
are discussed.
l#16: In this contribution, we present the most recent measurements ...
in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 3.0 - 3.9 GeV in STAR Fixed Target mode
l#18: For identification of π±, K±, and p, a combination of Time
Projection Chamber (TPC) and Time of Flight (TOF) is used
l#20-23: Suggest:
The left panel of Fig. 1 illustrates the rigidity (p/q: particle
momentum divided by charge) dependence of ionization energy loss (dE/dx)
in the TPC. The dashed line represents the theoretical ionization energy
loss curve for particles passing through the TPC. Particle
identification by TOF is based on the particle mass square (m^2)
distribution, which can be obtained from the particle velocity (β).
l#24-26: suggestion:
Moreover, the Kalman Filter (KF) particle package [3], where the
covariance matrix of reconstructed tracks is taken into account, is
employed to reconstruct weak decay particles (KS0 and Lambda).
l#26-28: suggestion:
An example of reconstructing the invariant mass using the KF particle
package is demonstrated with the KS0 meson in the right panel of Fig. 1.
l#30: kaon --> Kaon
l#31-33:
The anti-flow of kaons was first observed ..... 6 A GeV. It was
attributed to the repulsive potential associated with the strange quark
in K0S.
l#33-36: suggestion:
We have observed anti-flow behavior in kaons and pions for pT < 0.6
GeV/c in mid-central Au + Au collisions at 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, and 3.9 GeV
using the fixed target data from STAR.
l#37-43: suggestion:
The hadronic transport model JAM [5] calculations are compared with
experimental data at 3.9 GeV. The JAM model in hadronic cascade mode
(blue band) can successfully capture the anti-flow pattern at low pT for
π+ and K0S, even without the inclusion of a kaon potential [4]. However,
the JAM model with baryonic mean field (red band) tends to overestimate
the v1 slope for π+ and K0S. Additionally, the JAM mean field without
spectator contribution (black band) exhibits a larger v1 slope compared
to the one with spectators. The data-model comparisons above suggest
that the shadowing effect [6] from the spectator may also play a
significant role in generating anti-flow at low pT.
l#45-48: suggestion
The left and right panels of Fig. 3 illustrate the number of constituent
quarks (nq) scaled elliptic flow (v2/nq) as a function of transverse
kinetic energy ((mT − m0)/nq) for particles (π+, K+, K0S, p, and Λ) and
antiparticles (π−, K−, and K0S), respectively.
l#48-52: please re-format to clarify the sentence.
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2023-11-25 12:05 PM, Zuowen Liu wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Kindly find the updated proceeding by the link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65884
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Zuowen
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
>
> From: "Zuowen Liu"<liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>;
> Date: Fri, Nov 24, 2023 04:41 PM
> To: "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Cc: "subhash"<subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark
> Matter 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Thank you for the kind reminder.
> I would short it to four.
>
> Best regards,
> Zuowen
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
>
> From: "subhash via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Date: Wed, Nov 22, 2023 04:15 PM
> To: "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Cc: "subhash"<subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>;
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark
> Matter 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Zuowen,
>
> Thanks for posting your proceedings.
> I guess there are page limits on the proceedings. It supposed to be
> 4-page including references, you have 5-pages now.
> Can you please check and shorten it to fit the limit.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2023-11-10 05:14 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Zuowen Liu (liuzw AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65884
>>
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 11/10/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 11/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Zuowen Liu, 11/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Zuowen Liu, 11/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 11/29/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Zuowen Liu, 11/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 11/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Zuowen Liu, 11/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Zuowen Liu, 11/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zuowen Liu for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 11/22/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.