STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ADITYA PRASAD DASH <adityadash55 AT g.ucla.edu>]

Dear Dr. Subhash,

Thanks for your nice suggestions! The proceedings has been updated and can be found at the same link https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Exploring-Electromagnetic-Field-Effects-and-Constraining-Transport-6

Here are the updates

title: BES-II
Done

l#7-10: you can probably split it into two/three sentences. e.g.
In this work, we report measurements of two types of observables: (i) 
charge-dependent directed flow (∆v1), which is sensitive to the initial 
ultra-strong electromagnetic fields, and (ii) flow correlation, such as 
rn(η), which is sensitive to the initial longitudinal de-correlation and 
correlations among flow harmonics. These measurements contribute to 
constraining the initial state of the collisions.
Done

l#15-16: of heavy-ion collisions at RHIC energies.
Done

l#19: the medium properties (such as electrical conductivity) and on the 
formation time
Done

l#20: "is essential to understanding the evolution" --> is essential for 
understanding the evolution
Done

l#40: should contribute --> could contribute to a
Done

l#46: "Data at √sNN = 200 GeV..." --> to be more specific you can 
mention, the negative splitting in peripheral collisions at 200 GeV 
right?

The same sentence mentions peripheral collisions, does this look fine/ can you give a suggested sentence?

l#48: "The larger magnitudes of ∆dv1/dy in peripheral collisions at 
lower energies" ---> How about: An increase in magnitude of ∆dv1/dy in 
peripheral collisions with decrease in beam energies. Along this lines, 
you could mention we observed a similar pattern in data. It is not 
evident from the text.
Done. The increase in the magnitude of ∆dv1/dy in peripheral collisions with decrease in beam energy, observed in data, is expected from the longer passage times 2R/gamma and shorter lifetimes of the fireball (due to which the late-time dilution of the $v_1$ splitting is smaller) at lower collision

l#62-63: "r3(η) shows hints of larger deviation at lower beam energies"
--> I am not sure we can make conclusion on energy dependence based on 
uncertainties. You can rephrase it with keeping only AMPT comparison.
Done

l#77: "We have presented STAR preliminary measurements" --> We have 
presented measurements ... in the Beam Energy Scan program by STAR 
experiment.
Done. Should we mention preliminary measurements or just measurements?

Thanks,

Aditya

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 1:35 AM subhash via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Aditya,

Nicely written proceedings. I have a few suggestions for your
consideration:


title: BES-II

l#7-10: you can probably split it into two/three sentences. e.g.
In this work, we report measurements of two types of observables: (i)
charge-dependent directed flow (∆v1), which is sensitive to the initial
ultra-strong electromagnetic fields, and (ii) flow correlation, such as
rn(η), which is sensitive to the initial longitudinal de-correlation and
correlations among flow harmonics. These measurements contribute to
constraining the initial state of the collisions.

l#15-16: of heavy-ion collisions at RHIC energies.

l#19: the medium properties (such as electrical conductivity) and on the
formation time

l#20: "is essential to understanding the evolution" --> is essential for
understanding the evolution

l#40: should contribute --> could contribute to a

l#46: "Data at √sNN = 200 GeV..." --> to be more specific you can
mention, the negative splitting in peripheral collisions at 200 GeV
right?

l#48: "The larger magnitudes of ∆dv1/dy in peripheral collisions at
lower energies" ---> How about: An increase in magnitude of ∆dv1/dy in
peripheral collisions with decrease in beam energies. Along this lines,
you could mention we observed a similar pattern in data. It is not
evident from the text.

l#62-63: "r3(η) shows hints of larger deviation at lower beam energies"
--> I am not sure we can make conclusion on energy dependence based on
uncertainties. You can rephrase it with keeping only AMPT comparison.

l#77: "We have presented STAR preliminary measurements" --> We have
presented measurements ... in the Beam Energy Scan program by STAR
experiment.


Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2023-11-25 06:14 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Aditya Prasad Dash (adityaprasaddash55 AT gmail.com) has submitted a
> material
> for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66077
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l