STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material originally 
 
submitted by Sharang Rav Sharma ( sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in )  
at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/EMMI-Workshop-Probing-dense-baryonic-matter-hadrons-II-FAIR-Phase-0/Overview-fixed-tar

Comment:
Very nice slides. It seems you put a lot of efforts in making these results  
to create this review talk -- good job. Some of your slides are heavy. I hope 
 
you will have time to cover them all. A few of your slides lack references to 
 
preliminary data (you have to cite previous STAR talks). Also, consider  
adding a highlight sentence (in color) if you think a slide will take too  
long. I leave it to you.

I sign off with a few comments.

Slide#4:
"Enlarged rapidity acceptance" --> "Extended pseudorapidity acceptance"
"Extends η coverage from 1.0 to 1.5" --> "Extends η coverage from ±1.0 to  
±1.5"
Slide#6:
"Two main detectors" --> "Two detectors"
Slide#8:
"event-by-event fluctuations,"-->"event-by-event geometry and fluctuations,"
Slide#10:
"increases in magnitude with increasing rapidity" --> "increases in magnitude 
 
with increasing rapidity for most particle species"
"Magnitude of v 1 increases with increasing mass of the particle" -->  
"Magnitude of v1 has a strong particle species dependence"
Slide#11:
I don't understand this statement:
"v1 slope decreases in magnitude as collision energy increases --> Stronger  
tilted expansion."
Do you mean v1 slope decrease is due to more boost invariant structure of 3D  
geometry at higher energies ? This would not mean stronger tilt,
it would mean less tilt in a given slice of rapidity.

After this "Strong mean field at high baryon density region" add "(at lower  
energies)"

Slide#12:
After the first bullet on about negative slope add "at low pT"
Slide#13:
The right plot needs a reference for the preliminary results

Slide#18:
Needs a reference. "Disappearance of partonic collectivity" --> "Possible  
indication of the disappearance of partonic collectivity"

Slide#22:
"Geometry drives v3(\psi_1)" --> "strong geometric effect"
You should use this as your first bullet : "geometry drives v3(\psi_1)"
because non-zero v3(\psi_1) is already an indication of geometry driven  
v3(\Psi_1)

Slide#24:
"from coalescence mechanism" --> "from coalescence of nucleons"

Slide#27:
Needs a reference to STAR results (Ben's QM 2022 talk maybe)

Slide#30:
"Larger v_3{\Psi_1} for peripheral than central collisions" --> "Nonzero  
v_3{\Psi_1}, stronger in peripheral than central collisions"
"observed p T spectra" --> "observed for p_T spectra"
"indicating less baryon stopping" -->"indicating centrality-dependent baryon  
stopping"








---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov