Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] EXT: Re: FCV PWG meeting on 08/May/2024 Wed. 9:30 AM EDT

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Duckworth, Emilie" <educkwor AT kent.edu>
  • To: EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] EXT: Re: FCV PWG meeting on 08/May/2024 Wed. 9:30 AM EDT
  • Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 14:19:06 +0000

for the other 3 energies the resolution was just the approximation of:  √(2⟨cos⁡(Ψ_(east ep)-Ψ_(west ep) ) ⟩ )

for comparison, here is the resolution for 7.7 computed both ways:

Emmy

From: EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 12:03 AM
To: Duckworth, Emilie <educkwor AT kent.edu>
Cc: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: EXT: Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 08/May/2024 Wed. 9:30 AM EDT
 
Dear Emmy
Thank you very much, I understood that it clearly increased for those updated 
energies, very nice. By the way, do you know how it was done for the preliminary 
results on 3 other energies especially for 7.7 GeV? 
Best regards, ShinIchi

2024/05/09 12:55、Duckworth, Emilie <educkwor AT kent.edu>のメール:

 ShinIchi, 

the 7.7 resolution was not updated because the excess proton v1 measurement was already preliminary, only the 9.2, 11.5, 17.3, and 27 gev resolutions were updated. Also, the largest resolution was the 9.2, and that saw the largest change in slope, as can be seen in the attached graph. (clearer datapoints are new, faded ones are old). <image.png>

Emmy

From: EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 9:02 PM
To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Duckworth, Emilie <educkwor AT kent.edu>
Subject: EXT: Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 08/May/2024 Wed. 9:30 AM EDT
 
Dear Emmy
The resolution seems to be reasonable now, so the final results should be somewhat 
larger now compared to yesterday (since the resolution has been overestimated yesterday), 
however the final results are mostly unchanged. I see some small changes just for some of 
the energies with some small increase, but not much for 7.7GeV, where I was expecting 
the largest change with the highest resolution? Maybe you can make sure the change 
from yesterday for the each points in your page 23...
Best regards, ShinIchi

On May 9, 2024, at 6:29, Duckworth, Emilie via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Here is my updated preliminary request with the new resolution correction.

Emmy

From: Duckworth, Emilie
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 4:54 PM
To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 08/May/2024 Wed. 9:30 AM EDT
 
I would like to submit my CPOD presentation for review and request preliminary status for the plots I plan to show. Please see attached.

Emmy
<preliminary_request_pwg_presentation_2024-05-08.pptx>_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click any links, open any attachments, or REPLY to the message unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page