STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Duckworth, Emilie" <educkwor AT kent.edu>]

Hello Subash,

I have updated my slides as per your request:

X s#12: You can add reference of flow method paper.
X Fix the legend remove the underscore and some of the nomenclatures like
flattened can be written as final.

s#13: Bottom plot should be improved, please add proper labels on the
plot, Y-axis, X-axis (shifted) etc

      -not entirely sure what you're asking here, I added a Y-axis label and changed the location of the X axis label.

X You have mentioned that you are weighting with raw v1, but the
top-panels are corrected one, I guess. Then don't you use that one.

X s#17: Somewhere inside the figure, please indicate the kinematic cuts
(pt or momentum cuts) and  linear fit with fit range.

Why the proton v1, especially  at 7.7 GeV is so different? Is there any
difference in acceptance cut. BES-2 systematic is of similar order to
that of BEs-1 ! I am asking because you are saying significant in
accuracy in first bullet. But it doesn't look so.

      - The difference between the proton BES-I and BES-II proton slopes comes down to the fit: the BES-I 2018 results use a linear fit out to -0.8<y<0.8, I think its unwise to do that as the acceptance drops off at higher rapidity, so we instead fit over the range from -0.5<y<0.5. The Systematic Errors for proton and net proton at 7.7 through to 14.6 GeV are dominated by a cubic fit check. 

X s#19, 21: same as #17, indicate kinematic cuts.

X back up: I don't think we usually show the systematic checks or tables
outside STAR. please remove those. They are very technical and STAR
internal.

Sorry for uploading so late.

Emmy

---

From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of subhash via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2024 10:51 PM
To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Subject: EXT: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Emmy Duckworth for CPOD 2024 got commented by Zhenyu Chen

 

Dear Emmy,


Nice slides. I have a few additional comments below:

s#12: You can add reference of flow method paper.
Fix the legend remove the underscore and some of the nomenclatures like
flattened can be written as final.

s#13: Bottom plot should be improved, please add proper labels on the
plot, Y-axis, X-axis (shifted) etc
You have mentioned that you are weighting with raw v1, but the
top-panels are corrected one, I guess. Then don't you use that one.

s#17: Somewhere inside the figure, please indicate the kinematic cuts
(pt or momentum cuts) and  linear fit with fit range.

Why the proton v1, especially  at 7.7 GeV is so different? Is there any
difference in acceptance cut. BES-2 systematic is of similar order to
that of BEs-1 ! I am asking because you are saying significant in
accuracy in first bullet. But it doesn't look so.


s#19, 21: same as #17, indicate kinematic cuts.

back up: I don't think we usually show the systematic checks or tables
outside STAR. please remove those. They are very technical and STAR
internal.

A Policy reminder: As per STAR policy you should post your slides to
Drupal at least two weeks before deadline so that we have enough time to
review your slides.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash



On 2024-05-18 11:43 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Zhenyu Chen ( zhenyuchen AT sdu.edu.cn ) has commented on a material
> originally
> submitted by Emmy Duckworth ( educkwor AT kent.edu ) at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/CPOD-2024/Proton-Directed-Flow-Beam-Energy-Scan-II
>
> Comment:
> Nice slides. I sign off with few suggestions:
> - Slide4: make the 2nd and 3rd equation larger for visibility
> - Slide13: "some energies", please be more specific
> - Slide14: highly pure signals -> high purity signals
> - Slide22: define "reduced rapidity" since it is in summary; Eos -> EOS
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click any links, open any attachments, or REPLY to the message unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.