Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Priyanshi Sinha for AUM 2024 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Priyanshi Sinha for AUM 2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:19:16 +0800

Dear Priyanshi,

Nice slides. Thanks for putting together all these results. I have a few suggestions below for your consideration:

Title: How about: "Highlights on flow measurements from the STAR experiment"?
s#3: You can hight the STAR upgraded detectors here;
s#4: The text next to triangular flow seems slightly cut off, please check.
s#6: Suggest moving the top-corner bullet to the bottom, (IMO this is the main observation of energy dependence of splitting, at the corner it seems off the focus)
"Could be due to longer EM field" --> Could be due to longer lived EM field and shorter lifetime of fireball
I would suggest referring to our recent STAR PRX paper.
s#7: Consider referring to EPD acceptance which makes possible measuring v1 over 10 units of rapidity
I would suggest switching order of #6 and #7; First discuss on tte charged hadron, the identified particles.
s#8: breaking of scaling or scale breaking (?); You can pick up the latest plot from Emmy's CPOD-2024 presentation.
s#9: It looks a busy slide; So consider showing v2, v3 first on top then their scaling on the bottom to have a natural flow;
s#12: You probably need a rephrase of bullets;
The left bullet, you should be explicit that anti-flow observed for kaons at AGS (As per my understanding).
While from our BES FXT, we have seen low-pT anti-flow signals of both pions, kaons and kshort which can be explained nuclear shadowing using JAM (kaon anti flow is not unique); IMO, this is the new observation you should focus on. Please see Shusu's recent SQM-2024 slides;
s#13: I think you should also add NCQ scaling become a gradually better above 3.2 GeV;
Consider adding a reference to STAR 3 GeV PLB vn paper;
s#14: The 3 GeV points should be the published, isn't it?; Also add the reference to the recent 3 GeV FXT proton v3 PRC paper;
Check the typo on preliminary inside the figure;
s#19: Can you rephrase: "Gluon fluctuation around quark modelling"
s#20: strange hadrons' flow;
isobar collisions (Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr);
s#21: Can you rephrase the last two bullets. I think you mean v2 ratios are used to constrain initial conditions and nuclear structure in models (?)
add reference to STAR recent arXived deformation paper ie submitted to Nature.
s#22: Probably, you can group the bullets (e.g. coalescence mechanism at work for PID and light nuclei); you don't need to mention all of them, keep the most important ones;


Thanks and regards,
Subhash





On 2024-05-28 01:54 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Priyanshi Sinha (priyanshisinha AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has submitted a
material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67983

Deadline: 2024-06-11
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page