star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN
- From: Xu Sun <xusun AT impcas.ac.cn>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:53:40 +0800
Hi Sergei,
We have put the comparison between run11 and run14 in the Appendix B of the
AN v8.02.
Please find the updated version from the following link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AnalysisNote_phiSpinAlignment_v08_02.pdf
In addition, we have added supplemental material to demonstrate the
effectiveness of the correction method across all pt bins.
Best,
Xu
> On May 17, 2024, at 01:48, Sergei Voloshin via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Yesterday, at the FCV meeting, during the discussion of the spin
> alignment new analyses, some questions regarding the published
> results were brought up. In particular the comparison of the results
> obtained for 200 GeV from Run 11 and Run 14. I tried to find those
> results in the Analysis Note, but I did not find anything except that
> the difference was used for an estimate of the systematic error. From
> the same discussion at the meeting, as far as I understood, the Run 11
> results were very far (many sigmas) away from the results of Run 14,
> and even outside of the published systematic error. I think it is
> very important to document all such cases in the Analysis Note. I
> suggest the PA update (or better append) the AN with the corresponding
> data showing the results for Run11 and Run 14 separately, both for
> centrality, and the transverse momentum dependence.
> It could be also useful to record the reasoning to keep/trust Run 11
> results for other energies in case of 200 GeV results being that far
> from the reported values (outside of the systematic brackets).
>
> I know that there is some ongoing discussion on comparing different
> approaches and results on spin alignment from different groups. My
> question/request is not about that. I am only asking to include in the
> AN the important data that was used for publication.
>
> best regards,
> Sergei
>
> --
> ======================================
> Sergei A. Voloshin
> Distinguished Professor,
> Department of Physics and Astronomy,
> Wayne State University,
> 666 W. Hancock, Detroit, Michigan, 48201
> e-mail: sergei.voloshin AT wayne.edu
> ======================================
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN,
Sergei Voloshin, 05/16/2024
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN,
Xu Sun, 05/29/2024
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN, Sergei Voloshin, 05/30/2024
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] spin alignment Nature paper: request to append the AN,
Xu Sun, 05/29/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.