Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Muhammad Farhan Taseer for SQM-2024 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Muhammad Farhan Taseer <mfarhan_taseer AT yahoo.com>
  • To: "star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Muhammad Farhan Taseer for SQM-2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 03:23:52 +0000 (UTC)

Dear Sooraj,
I have uploaded the latest file in pdf on the drupal page. You can see the final version at the following link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2024/Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-BES-II-AuA-1

Regards
Muhammad Farhan Taseer
IMP, Lanzhou, China.



On Friday, 31 May 2024 at 10:17:10 am GMT+8, Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov> wrote:


Hi Muhammad,
   Thanks for making the change. Please upload pdf file of your latest version and keep only the latest version on the drupal page

Best,
Sooraj

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:26 PM Muhammad Farhan Taseer via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Sooraj,
Thanks for your nice comment and suggestions. I have updated my conclusion slide. You can see updated version_4 at the following link:


Regarding your question "Do you have an explanation for where this difference is coming from?".... still we dont have any clear arguments about the mechanism that actually causing this difference. We shall discuss it with theorist in SQM.

Regards
Muhammad Farhan Taseer
IMP, Lanzhou, China.




On Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 10:57:13 am GMT+8, Sooraj Radhakrishnan via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:


Hi Muhammad,
   Thanks for preparing these nice slides 

In the conclusions you highlight that there is a significant ordering of Delta v1 between the three systems. But I dont see this from your S11, particularly for the peripheral collisions where you attribute the difference to EM field effects. Between Au+Au and U+U the values in central collision also are close, may be you can make this claim for 10-40% centrality

In your conclusion slide if you want to highlight the system difference, should say that the observation is for central collisions (10-40% ?). Do you have an explanation for where this difference is coming from?

thanks,
Sooraj

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:00 PM webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Muhammad Farhan Taseer (mfarhan_taseer AT yahoo.com) has submitted a material 
for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67919

Deadline: 2024-06-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l


--
Sooraj Radhakrishnan
Research Scientist,
Department of Physics
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44242

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
Berkeley, CA 94720
Ph: 510-495-2473
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l


--
Sooraj Radhakrishnan
Research Scientist,
Department of Physics
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44242

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
Berkeley, CA 94720
Ph: 510-495-2473



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page