STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[psinha <psinha AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Prithwish,

Thank you for these useful comments. Please find below the link to 
updated presentation with all the changes as suggested.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/AUM-2024/Highlights-STAR-experiment-flow-measurements

Kindly let me know for any other modifications required.

Thanks and regards,
Priyanshi

On 2024-06-03 08:53, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material 
> originally
> submitted by Priyanshi Sinha ( 
> priyanshisinha AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in )
> at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/AUM-2024/Highlights-STAR-experiment-flow-measurements
>
> Comment:
> Very nice slides!! I sign off with the following comments.
> Slide#2: It would be good to add p/d/He+Au on lower left part of 
> systems scan
> at top RHIC energy
> "colliders energies" --> "collider energies"
> Slide#3: TOF has a coverage of |\eta|<0.9, cross check acceptance of
> different systems
> Slide#6: "over ten units" --> "over nine units (|\eta|<1.5 & 
> 2.1<|\eta|<5.1)"
> "Precision measurement for limiting fragmentation", since "limiting
> fragmentation" is a phenomenon and not a measurable observable, you 
> need to
> revise accordingly.
> You can write something like "precision measurement of v1 enables 
> observation
> of limiting fragmentation"
> Slide#7:
> "Could be due to longer lived EM field and shorter lifetime of 
> fireball" -->
> "Could be due to EM-field effect, longer-lived field and shorter 
> lifetime of
> fireball"
> I am not sure about last bullet, we do not see increase with pt, we see
> increase and then decrease.
> How about "Indication of strong pt dependence of splitting"
> Slide#8:
> "scale breaking", what do you mean by it? Please clarify
> "v1,excess" --> "v1 excess"
> Slide#10: The last bullet is not clear "Weak Energy dependence à More
> sensitive to initial state than final"
> Slide#13: " Scaling become a gradually better" --> " Scaling becomes
> gradually better"
> Slide#14: "|v3{Ψ1}| increases towards peripheral collisions --> 
> Geometry
> drives v3{Ψ1}" This is not clear, maybe you should put the cartoon of 
> page 4
> here.
> Also, rephrase it to indicate that "Observation of non-zero v3{\Psi_1} 
> and
> increase in peripheral collisions --> Geometry driven v3 at lower 
> energy"
> Slide#18: This sentence is incorrect: "v2 (p+Au) < v2(d+Au, 3He+Au)
> collisions --> Influence from sub-nucleonic eccentricity fluctuations"
> I would suggest you to modify it to:
> "v3 (p+Au) ~ v3(d+Au) ~ v3(3He+Au) -->  Influence from sub-nucleonic 
> scale
> geometry fluctuations"
> Slide#19:
> "v3 (O+O) ≈ v2(d+Au) ≈ v2(3He+Au)" There is a typo, I think it 
> should be
> "v3 (O+O) ≈ v3(d+Au) ≈ v3(3He+Au)"
> Please check ref: PRC 94 (2016), 024919, I don't see where it says 
> "εn(d+Au)
> ≈ εn(3He+Au); n=2,3"
> Slide#22:
> "EM field effect from a shorter lifetime of fireball observed towards 
> lower
> beam energies" --> "Observation consistent with EM-field effect and 
> shorter
> lifetime of fireball observed towards lower beam energies"
> This bullet is not clear "Anti-flow of mesons observation indicates 
> towards
> nuclear shadowing effect" please revise.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l