STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a material  
originally submitted by Gang Wang ( gwang AT physics.ucla.edu ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/8th-International-Conference-Chirality-Vorticity-and-Magnetic-Field-Quantum-Matter/S-2

Comment:
Dear Gang and Huan,

Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:

s#4: Please check the typo: correlator
Would you also like to mention about \gamma_{132} which you'll also discuss  
later in slides.

s#7: should we say "no duration"; I mean it could be small but non-zero.
s#7 & 8: third bullet v2 --> v_2
s#13: PPOI --> POI
s#14: Events --> Good events or analyzed events (to distinguish it from total 
 
collected events at RHIC)
s#17: removes v2-BKG --> suppress v2-BKG
s#19: I don't understand how the 5 sigma is estimated, could you please  
clarify? If my understanding correct that first you say \gamma_{132} ~ 0 then 
 
based on gamma_ESS/gamma you make the statement integrated over three  
energies. In my opinion 5 sigma is really a strong statement, depends how you 
 
estimate it and if any residual background remains in ESS. To anyone outside  
STAR it might sound we discovered a CME signal. I would suggest modifying the 
 
bullets or make it a bit softer adding a caution statement.

Please double check the footers in slides, speakers names are inconsistent in 
 
some of them.

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov