star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Longitudinal flow-plane decorrelation from multiple-plane cumulants with STAR"
- From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Achyut Khanal <hp4820 AT wayne.edu>
- Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Longitudinal flow-plane decorrelation from multiple-plane cumulants with STAR"
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 17:05:08 +0800
Dear Achyut, PAs,
Thanks for preparing very comprehensive materials, and the paper draft is in very good shape. I sign-off with a few minor suggestions for your consideration:
1. Datassets and event selection, you could consider adding Au+Au event selection as well. I think the current limits are only for isobar analysis. The Au+Au data is used in Fig. 9 as far as I see.
2. The section on systematic uncertainty, maybe you can list the nominal cuts and variations in tables instead of bullet (but it's your choice). I would also like to bring to your attention that it is suggested by PWGC that if we use a sqrt(12) method for systematic uncertainty, it should be verified that the assumptions are valid. Probably in your case, it doesn't matter and dominated by statistics.
"Quoting systematic uncertainties in STAR results and measurements
- Some results/groups use differences between variations divided by sqrt(12) as the systematic uncertainty while others quote just the difference
- Dividing by sqrt(12) relies on some assumptions - that the variation is uniformly distributed and that the change of cuts capture the range of variations. For the cases that divide the difference by sqrt(12) it should be shown that the assumptions are satisfied"
3. Should we quote centrality integrated T_2 or T_3 values along the summary and discussion section? Although you have it in your figures. The data points are fluctuating due to statistics and it is bit difficult to gauge the small but negative number, a quantitative centrality integrated number might help.
4. The figures and labelling are bit small, it may not fit PRC requirement. Please increase them.
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2024-07-17 12:09 AM, Achyut Khanal wrote:
Dear FCV Conveners,
We would like to request GPC formation for our paper "Longitudinal
flow-plane decorrelation from multiple-plane cumulants with STAR”.
Our target journal is PRC.
Latest draft of paper can be found here:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/star_deco_PRC_draft_jul16.pdf
Latest draft of analysis note can be found here:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/analysis_note_decorrelation_jul16.pdf
The paper proposal blog with proposed figures and and other details
can be found here:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/akhanal/Paper-Longitudinal-flow-plane-decorrelation-multiple-plane-cumulants-STAR
Please let us know if you have any comments, suggestions from your end
so that we can move this paper forward towards publication.
Sincerely,
Achyut Khanal
- Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Longitudinal flow-plane decorrelation from multiple-plane cumulants with STAR", subhash, 08/02/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.