Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] STAR presentation by Muhammad Farhan Taseer for SQM-2024 got commented by Prithwish Tribedy

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Muhammad Farhan Taseer <mfarhan_taseer AT yahoo.com>
  • To: "star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] STAR presentation by Muhammad Farhan Taseer for SQM-2024 got commented by Prithwish Tribedy
  • Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 06:42:53 +0000 (UTC)

Dear Prithwish,
Thank you for your nice comments. I have updated the proceedings as per your suggestions. The latest version can be found at the following link: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/mftaseer/SQM-20204-Proceeding-Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-


Precisely speaking, I have addressed you comments as:

The main point is that you discuss BES results but do not show any plots. 
Also, you don't cite any previous references where such results were shown. 
This makes it a bit difficult to follow the discussion.
You can either remove this part and focus this on the system dependence to 
make a more coherent write up. You can also say that BES data were previously 
presented elsewhere with a citation.

Answer: The BES-II results for Au+Au collisions at lower energies are already presented by a STAR collaborator from UCLA in QM-2023. I have added the reference of his paper for more clarification.


line 18:
"significant importance in QCD," --> "significant importance in exploring the 
properties of QCD matter under extreme conditions,"  (you need to imply here 
that B-field is external catalyst to QCD)
Answer: Implemented as per your suggestions

Consistently use "Delta" or "\Delta"
Answer: Implemented

To save space, combine ref 1 & 2 into one, consider citing arXiv:2304.02831 
along with arXiv:2304.03430 as reference 4 and cite them after line 37.
Answer: Implemented

line 42: previous study had 27 GeV data, so edit this line accordingly
Answer: Implemented

line 45:
I guess this part "and different beam energies in Au+Au collisions." is not 
relevant for current discussion, you can remove it. If you want to keep it, 
you need a reference.

Answer: Removed this part for more clarification



Line 63:
After the line about pions, add which needs further investigation

Answer: Implemented as per your suggestions



Also, somewhere add a line about the system dependence of v1 slope in the 
context of EM-field, say it needs further exploration and theoretical input.

Answer:  Added in Summary (Line No. 81) “The v1 dependence on system size can be due to the presence of extremely strong magnetic fields at very early stages of collisions, however it needs more exploration and theoretical input”.


 
Regards

Muhammad Farhan Taseer
Institute of Modern Physics,
CAS, Lanzhou, China.







On Monday, 26 August 2024 at 06:13:15 am GMT+8, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov> wrote:



Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material originally 
submitted by Muhammad Farhan Taseer ( mfarhan_taseer AT yahoo.com ) at

Comment:
Nice proceedings. I sign off with a few comments.

The main point is that you discuss BES results but do not show any plots. 
Also, you don't cite any previous references where such results were shown. 
This makes it a bit difficult to follow the discussion.
You can either remove this part and focus this on the system dependence to 
make a more coherent write up. You can also say that BES data were previously 
presented elsewhere with a citation.

line 18:
"significant importance in QCD," --> "significant importance in exploring the 
properties of QCD matter under extreme conditions,"  (you need to imply here 
that B-field is external catalyst to QCD)

Consistently use "Delta" or "\Delta"

To save space, combine ref 1 & 2 into one, consider citing arXiv:2304.02831 
along with arXiv:2304.03430 as reference 4 and cite them after line 37.

line 42: previous study had 27 GeV data, so edit this line accordingly

line 45:
I guess this part "and different beam energies in Au+Au collisions." is not 
relevant for current discussion, you can remove it. If you want to keep it, 
you need a reference.

Line 63:
After the line about pions, add which needs further investigation

Also, somewhere add a line about the system dependence of v1 slope in the 
context of EM-field, say it needs further exploration and theoretical input.





---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page