STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Muhammad Farhan Taseer <mfarhan_taseer AT yahoo.com>]

Hi Richard,

Thank you for your nice comments. I have updated the proceedings as per your suggestions. The latest version can be found at the following link:  "https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2024/Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-BES-II-AuA-2"

Precisely speaking, I have addressed you comments as:

 

Line 43. - rewire to

Previous studies by the STAR collaboration on Delta (dv1/dy) in Au+Au collusions at sort(sin)=27 GeV, as well and Au+Au and isobar collisions at top RHIC energy (sort(Snn)=200 GeV) are consistent with the expectation from the dominance of the Faraday and Coulomb effects in peripheral collisions [3,8]

Answer: Implemented

L54 : linear function “y=mx” -> linear fit

Answer: Implemented

L58 delete kill “as well as v1 dependence on system size” 

 (You make the comment about system size in the next line

we would like to keep this sentence to refer system size dependence for individual particle species. The next line discusses system size dependence for delta v1.

L65 “is proton” -> “for the proton”

Answer: Implemented

L72 (as we go down in the beam energy) -> as the bream energy is reduced 

i.e. reword and kill the ()

Answer: Implemented

L76 keep -> keeps

 “Contrary” -> “contrast”

Answer: Implemented

L83 

“Align” -> “collisions is consistent”

Answer: Implemented

Regards

Muhammad Farhan Taseer

Institute of Modern Physics,

CAS, Lanzhou, China.

On Wednesday, 28 August 2024 at 05:04:06 am GMT+8, Richard Seto" (via star-fcv-l Mailing List) <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Farhan (is that the right way to address you?) 

I have a few comments and then I sign off - but as a new convener - Subash will do the final sign-off as I don’t have the access yet.

Most of the is just wording 

Line 43. - rewire to

Previous studies by the STAR collaboration on Delta (dv1/dy) in Au+Au collusions at sort(sin)=27 GeV, as well and Au+Au and isobar collisions at top RHIC energy (sort(Snn)=200 GeV) are consistent with the expectation from the dominance of the Faraday and Coulomb effects in peripheral collisions [3,8]

L54 : linear function “y=mx” -> linear fit

L58 delete kill “as well as v1 dependence on system size” 

 (You make the comment about system size in the next line

L65 “is proton” -> “for the proton”

L72 (as we go down in the beam energy) -> as the bream energy is reduced 

i.e. reword and kill the ()

L76 keep -> keeps

 “Contrary” -> “contrast”

L83 

“Align” -> “collisions is consistent”

-Rich

Richard Seto
richard.seto AT ucr.edu
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521

On Aug 23, 2024, at 3:20 AM, Muhammad Farhan Taseer (via star-fcv-l Mailing List) <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Convenors,

                           I have uploaded SQM 2-24 proceedings for STAR approval. My proceedings can be found at the following link: "https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/mftaseer/SQM-20204-Proceeding-Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-"

Regards

Muhammad Farhan Taseer

Institute of Modern Physics,

CAS, Lanzhou, China.