STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Yunshan Cheng <yunshancheng AT g.ucla.edu>]

Dear Prithwish and Subhash,

Thank you for your helpful comments. I have modified my poster abstract according to your suggestions, and it is named "QM_2025_CME_abstract_UCLA_v5".

The only thing I didn't change is:

"l#10: I suggest using notation same as previous: \Delta_gamma^112_ESS" 

The \Delta_gamma^112 in line 10 means the observable before applying ESS method, so I kept using "\Delta_gamma^112" instead of "\Delta_gamma^112_ESS". And I changed the "charge separation signal" to "charge separation observable" in front of it for better clarification.

Best,

Yunshan

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:53 AM <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material originally 
submitted by Yunshan Cheng ( yunshancheng AT g.ucla.edu ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2025/Using-Innovative-Event-Shape-Selection-Method-Search-Chiral-Magnetic

Comment:
Nice abstract!! A few things to consider in the next version with which I 
sign off!!

consider replacing:


"At all energies, the spectator plane is reconstructed using the Event Plane 
Detector or Zero Degree Calorimeter to determine the magnetic field 
direction, thereby minimizing nonflow effects."
-->
"We use the spectator neutron plane from the Zero Degree Calorimeter at 200 
GeV and the forward proton-rich directed flow plane from the Event Plane 
Detector at lower energies to determine the magnetic field direction and 
minimize nonflow effects."


"After background suppression, an intriguing \Delta\gamma_112 has been 
observed in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{s_NN} = 11.5, 14.6, and 19.6 GeV, each 
with a significance greater than 3\sigma.."
-->
"After ESS background suppression, a non-zero charge separation signal 
\Delta\gamma_112_ESS is observed in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{s_NN}  = 11.5, 
14.6, and 19.6 GeV, each with significance over 3\sigma.."


Make a new sentence:
", whereas the background indicator \Delta\gamma_132 becomes zero."
-->
", whereas ESS applied to the background indicator \Delta\gamma_132 yields 
zero."

"Below 10 GeV and at 200 GeV, the charge separation is consistent with zero"
-->
"Below \sqrt{s_NN}=10 GeV and at 200 GeV, "\Delta\gamma_112_ESS"  is 
consistent with zero"

Maybe you can move this line before you talk about 132.




---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov