STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Sharang,

Nice slides. I have a few questions and suggestions:

Could you point to me if you have any new candidate of preliminary, that 
will be shown for the first time?

s#3: suggest to remove "Predicted" from first bullet, because I believe 
it is common for all the bullets? and they will probed using BES data.

s#4:You can also mention the mu_B corresponding to beam energy of 
interest.

s#5: left figure, can you make the labels for individual particles 
prominent like you did for the rhs figure.

s#7: "Signature of 1st order phase transition" --> I don't think we 
should say, this is the signature of 1st order PT. You can rephrase it 
as, predicted signature for softening of EoS near 1st order phase 
transition. Then also add a reference of the study (Stoeker et al ?)
"No minima for net-K" --> not sufficient data to locate possible minima 
for net-K using BES-I data or no minima observed for net-K with BES-I 
data
BTW, do you know what do we learn with minimum of net-kaon, any theory 
predictions?
"Approximate mass no. scaling" --> perform mass number scaling with 
precise BES-II data (because for BES-I uncertainties are quite large, 
central values for p and d are opposite)
you can probably rephrase suggested wordings accordingly

"Nucleon coalescence" --> test of Nucleon coalescence, because it seems 
the triton is clearly not scaling with A, right?

s#9: add a reference for JAM model,
the legends for JAM seems blurred in my screen.
when you say "JAM with mean-field gives better description to the 
experimental data", can you point out which scenario is favored than the 
other, NS2 vs MD2?


s#11: "No requirement of Kaon potential" --> I think better to say, kaon 
potential is not necessary or not a necessary condition


#12: "Might be a signature of 1st order phase transition" --> May be we 
can rephrase it as "the connection with changes in the Equation of State 
(EoS) is to be explored"
"JAM mean-field gives a better description ..." --> can we say anything 
on preferred compressibility parameter?

ps: I believe Drupal is back, and you can upload your updated 
presentation.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2024-11-25 11:28 AM, sharangrav wrote:
> Dear convenors,
>
> I hope this email finds you well. I am experiencing difficulty
> connecting to the server to upload my presentation for the conference,
> as it has been offline for the past two days. Therefore, I am sharing
> my presentation slides here in this email thread for your kind review
> and valuable comments.
> I would greatly appreciate it if you could let me know of any comments
> or suggestions. Once the server is back online, I will promptly submit
> my slides there as well.
> Thank you very much for your time and kind consideration.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sharang Rav Sharma
>
>
> On 2024-09-04 17:36, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Sharang Rav Sharma (sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> > submitted a
> > material for a review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68805
> >
> > Deadline: 2024-09-15
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov