star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
- From: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Cc: Richard Seto <seto AT ucr.edu>, Subhash Singha <subhash AT impcas.ac.cn>, Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>, Prithwish Tribedy <prithwish2005 AT gmail.com>, EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 16:05:26 -0500
Hi ShinIchi and all,
Thank you for the excellent compilation! Should we consider moving your v1 talk to Friday? This would allow you to include both public and STAR internal results, providing more flexibility to address key issues that support or challenge EM-field explanations. I list a few points for you to consider on both support and apparent challenge to EM-field explanations:
1. Proton results change sign with centrality across all energies -- supports naive EM-field expectations
2. Kaon results follow proton trends but are weaker -- supports EM-field if we assume strange quark behave differently
3. Pion results align with protons/kaons at low energies, pion-proton-kaon all showing same trend -- challenging transport-only explanations.
4. Above (#3) may not be the case for 200 GeV, it's unclear if pion results change sign like protons at 200 GeV -- points to something is missing in our understanding
5. Net-ΛΛ results are almost on top of protons, despite Λ's have no electric charge -- challenges naive EM-field explanation
6. Splitting increases with ΔqΔq, ΔBΔB, and ΔSΔS, if you assume NCQ scaling holds for produced particles -- supports both EM-field & has been explained by hydro models with baryon inhomogeneity
8. NCQ scaling -- crucial but is hard to verify, attempt made for produced quarks only with limited significance, but there are proof that it does not hold for mixture of produced & transported quarks
7. Hydro models explain proton data without EM fields -- challenging EM explanations
8. Hydro models has not demonstrated that they can explain all PID data -- incompleteness to hydro models that challenge EM-field explanations
9. Other models such as mean field -- I am not an expert but it's worth touching.
Overall, this is a fascinating topic that deserves lengthy discussion, so having it as the last talk of the day may not be ideal.
Let me know your thoughts!
Best,
Prithwish
On 2024-12-01 12:40, EsumiShinIchi wrote:
Dear Rich, Subhash, Prithwish and all
I send you the draft of my talk on v1 splitting with materials that
are already in public,
if you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thank you very much
in advance.
Best regards, ShinIchi
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/v1split_bes2star_Esumi_2024Dec04.pdf
Hi Everyone
I like Subash’s suggestion
To be clear it is now
Sooraj - v1, v2 (and v3?) of light and strange hadrons and
implications
Chengdong Han - light and hyper nuclei flow
Xingrui Gou - Global and local polarization in BES-II COL (note that
we intend to make FXT-polarization a separate talk)
Zhiwan Xu - Chiral effects (CME related) in BES-II and 200GeV
Shinichi - v1 splitting and possible interpretations
Pretty good. Hope we can fit it all in. I think at least Sooraj and
Shinichi’s talks should be in the open session with the theorists
-Rich
Dear Sooraj, ShinIchi, Richard and Prithwish,
My understanding is that we were looking for candidates whose
talks could present an unbiased perspective on topics such as the
onset of partonic collectivity (bringing together all viewpoints)
and the electromagnetic field (covering both electromagnetic and
non-electromagnetic scenarios). However, we did not reach a
consensus on the EM-talk.
Therefore, may I suggest having ShinIchi give a summary talk on
the experimental results of v1-splitting from STAR (if possible
and if you agree), followed by a theorist? I would recommend
Sandeep Chatterjee to discuss v1 with hydrodynamics. He is an
expert on v1 splitting due to EM (predicted D-meson v1 splitting)
and non-electromagnetic scenario with baryon. This talk could be
part of an open session, as most of our v1 results are public.
Although I don't see much space in agenda to accommodate
v1-splitting theory speaker, I’m cc’ing ShinIchi here to get
his opinion on this.
The followings are rest of the talks from FCV:
Sooraj - Summarizing v1, v2 of light and strange hadrons
Chengdong Han - light and hyper nuclei flow
Xingrui Gou - Global and local polarization in BES-II COL (note
that we intend to make FXT-polarization a separate talk)
Zhiwan Xu - Chiral effects (CME related) in BES-II and 200GeV
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
EsumiShinIchi, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Prithwish Tribedy, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Diyu Shen, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
EsumiShinIchi, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
EsumiShinIchi, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
subhash, 12/02/2024
- Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 12/02/2024
- Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop, EsumiShinIchi, 12/04/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
subhash, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
EsumiShinIchi, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
EsumiShinIchi, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Diyu Shen, 12/01/2024
-
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] v1 v2 talk at the workshop,
Prithwish Tribedy, 12/01/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.