STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Aditya,

Thanks for your answer. I have one follow up comment:

s#11: I see that you apply Barlow check. But having zero systematic 
seems odd, because rest of bins or neighboring bins have large 
systematic, comparable to your statistical errors. Please check if you 
can improve for those points. Also, do you have a plot to show 
systematic variations?

Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2024-12-16 03:13 PM, aditya wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
>
> Below are the answers for your queries:
>
> s#4: Why do you have the same number of events, isn't that Zr+Zr has
> more than Ru+Ru?
> > These are number of events after cut. I have now mentioned this on 
> > this slide.
>
> s#10: you could spell out RFP and POI, for the first time either here
> or in previous slides?
> > I have added this on this slide now.
>
>
> s#11: Why is the systematic error smaller for most peripheral bins?
> > I used Barlow Check to calculate the Systematic uncertainties. The 
> > statistical errors are large for peripheral bins, these large 
> > fluctuations overshadow systematic variation and thus results in small 
> > or no systematic errors by Barlow Check.
>
> s#12: Are these errors on the plot statistical or both syst and stat
> combined, please mention it.
> > I have included the systematic error bars now to the plot, were not 
> > included before.
>
> I have updated the presentation. Please let me know if further changes
> are required.
>
> Presentation is available at following link,
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/70221
>
> Thanks and regards
> Aditya
>
> On 2024-12-16 08:11, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a 
> > material
> > originally submitted by Aditya Rana ( aditya.rna2 AT gmail.com ) at
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/XXVI-DAE-BRNS-High-Energy-Physics-Symposium-2024/Probing-Chiral-Magnetic-Wave-isobar-0
> >
> > Comment:
> > Nice slides. I have a few questions and  suggestions:
> > s#4: Why do you have the same number of events, isn't that Zr+Zr has 
> > more
> > than Ru+Ru?
> > s#10: you could spell out RFP and POI, for the first time 
> > either here or in
> > previous slides?
> > s#11: Why is the systematic error smaller for most peripheral bins?
> > s#12: Are these errors on the plot statistical or both syst and stat
> > combined, please mention it.
> >
> > I sign off with these addressed.
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov