STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[aditya <aditya AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Subhash,

Thank you for your suggestions and pushing the presentation to 
star-talk.

I have implemented your suggestions and updated the slides.

Thanks and regards
Aditya

On 2024-12-17 04:40, subhash wrote:
> Dear Aditya,
>
> I think it is bit odd to show points with zero systematic error for
> peripheral bins. In this case, since you don't have much time left
> before the conference we suggest removing the peripheral bins on
> slide#11, 12. This wouldn't cause any change in your physics
> conclusion.
> With this suggestion, I am pushing it to star-talks.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2024-12-16 06:25 PM, aditya wrote:
> > Dear Subhash,
> >
> > I have attached plot to show systematic variation for covariance of v3
> > and A for both Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr. In the plot it can be seen that for
> > the last centrality bin, statistical errors are large as compared to
> > the rest of the centrality bins and by using Barlow check systematics
> > comes out to be zero.
> >
> > Hope this clears the doubt. If there are any further suggestions and
> > questions please let me know.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aditya
> >
> > On 2024-12-16 13:01, subhash wrote:
> > > Dear Aditya,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your answer. I have one follow up comment:
> > >
> > > s#11: I see that you apply Barlow check. But having zero systematic
> > > seems odd, because rest of bins or neighboring bins have large
> > > systematic, comparable to your statistical errors. Please check if 
> > > you
> > > can improve for those points. Also, do you have a plot to show
> > > systematic variations?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > > Subhash
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2024-12-16 03:13 PM, aditya wrote:
> > > > Dear Subhash,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
> > > >
> > > > Below are the answers for your queries:
> > > >
> > > > s#4: Why do you have the same number of events, isn't that Zr+Zr has
> > > > more than Ru+Ru?
> > > > > These are number of events after cut. I have now mentioned this on 
> > > > > this slide.
> > > >
> > > > s#10: you could spell out RFP and POI, for the first time 
> > > > either here
> > > > or in previous slides?
> > > > > I have added this on this slide now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > s#11: Why is the systematic error smaller for most peripheral bins?
> > > > > I used Barlow Check to calculate the Systematic uncertainties. The 
> > > > > statistical errors are large for peripheral bins, these large 
> > > > > fluctuations overshadow systematic variation and thus results in 
> > > > > small or no systematic errors by Barlow Check.
> > > >
> > > > s#12: Are these errors on the plot statistical or both syst and stat
> > > > combined, please mention it.
> > > > > I have included the systematic error bars now to the plot, were not 
> > > > > included before.
> > > >
> > > > I have updated the presentation. Please let me know if further 
> > > > changes
> > > > are required.
> > > >
> > > > Presentation is available at following link,
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/70221
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and regards
> > > > Aditya
> > > >
> > > > On 2024-12-16 08:11, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> > > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a 
> > > > > material
> > > > > originally submitted by Aditya Rana ( aditya.rna2 AT gmail.com ) at
> > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/XXVI-DAE-BRNS-High-Energy-Physics-Symposium-2024/Probing-Chiral-Magnetic-Wave-isobar-0
> > > > >
> > > > > Comment:
> > > > > Nice slides. I have a few questions and  suggestions:
> > > > > s#4: Why do you have the same number of events, isn't that Zr+Zr 
> > > > > has more
> > > > > than Ru+Ru?
> > > > > s#10: you could spell out RFP and POI, for the first time 
> > > > > either here or in
> > > > > previous slides?
> > > > > s#11: Why is the systematic error smaller for most 
> > > > > peripheral bins?
> > > > > s#12: Are these errors on the plot statistical or both syst and 
> > > > > stat
> > > > > combined, please mention it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I sign off with these addressed.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov