STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Prabhupada,

Thanks for the updated slides. It wasn't clear to me that the talk is 
only for 7 minutes. I sign off with a few minor suggestions:

s#1: Fig. title: QCD phase diagram
 you can rephrase bullet on the right --> Study the disappearance of 
partonic collectivity via flow measurements at varying beam energies 
(proxy for baryon chemical potential)

s#6: can be moved to back up;
"for antiparticles"

s#8 & 9: In title: at FXT experiments --> at sNN = 3.0 - 4.5 GeV (to be 
consistent with previous slides)

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2025-01-03 09:41 PM, pdixit wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
> Thanks for your nice suggestions. I have implemented them in the new 
> version.
> The latest version:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ATHIC_presentation_v2.pdf
> Answers to some of your comments are given below:
> > > s#6: you can have one slide on v2 calculation method, EP resolution 
> > > etc
> > > before showing the final result
> I have a flash talk of 7 minutes only including Q&A that's why I
> prefer to show only motivation and recent results without going into
> details of analysis procedure. Let me know what is your thought? If
> you suggest further I will add analysis details.
> > > BTW, for collider energies why are you showing only 19.6 GeV? Can you 
> > > add a
> > > statement or show that for other COL BES-II energies, NCQ scaling 
> > > holds?
> I have added one more slide showing 14.6 GeV results. Other energies
> are not yet preliminary accepted.
>
> regards,
> Prabhupada
>
> On 2025-01-03 13:54, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a 
> > material
> > originally submitted by Prabhupada Dixit ( prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in 
> > ) at
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/10th-Asian-Triangle-Heavy-Ion-Conference-ATHIC-2025/Searching-Turn-Signature-QGP-Aniso
> >
> > Comment:
> > Dear Prabhupada, Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your
> > consideration:
> >
> > Consider adding slide numbers.
> > s#3: First bullet--> driven by Initial spatial spatial anisotropy
> > Second bullet: driven by the fluctuation in the position of the 
> > participant
> > nucleons (geometric fluctuation)
> > s#4: signature of partonic collectivity
> > s#5: STAR detector
> > s#6: you can have one slide on v2 calculation method, EP resolution 
> > etc
> > before showing the final result
> >
> > BTW, for collider energies why are you showing only 19.6 GeV? Can you 
> > add a
> > statement or show that for other COL BES-II energies, NCQ scaling 
> > holds?
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov