star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
- From: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
- To: star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: [Star-fst-l] Fwd: Spacing of FST Planes
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:22:49 -0500
Begin forwarded message:From: "Ye, Zhenyu" <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>Subject: Re: Spacing of FST PlanesDate: September 11, 2019 at 1:22:14 PM CDTTo: "Sharma, Rahul" <rsharma AT bnl.gov>Cc: "Scheblein, John A" <schebs AT bnl.gov>Hi Rahul,
The Z-locations of the sensors of the 3 FST disks in simulation are z=140.0, 154.0, and 168.0 cm. Putting them at these locations allow a maximum distance among the stations and a full coverage for 2.5<eta<4 w.r.t. collisions at z=0cm.
I have to say that there may be a possibility to increase the distances among the disks to increase the level arm length and thus improve the tracking performance (but at the cost of losing full 3-silicon disk acceptance coverage). We will study this once Daniel’s new tracking code is fully ready.
Best,
ZhenyuOn Sep 11, 2019, at 12:49 PM, Sharma, Rahul <rsharma AT bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Zhenyu,
I've a couple of conflicting numbers for spacing of FST discs in my models. Can you please send me the distance of all 3 planes from IR from your record. We are working on detail design and it will be good to have correct numbers so that we don't need to change it again.
- Rahul
-
[Star-fst-l] Fwd: Spacing of FST Planes,
Zhenyu Ye, 09/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Spacing of FST Planes, Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 09/11/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.