Star-fst-l mailing list

["Sharma, Rahul" <rsharma AT bnl.gov>]

Hi Flemming,

 

Yes, that is correct. 9.25” number is what we have been using for long time. That can be changed if needed.

 

• Rahul

 

From: flemming videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 10:02 AM
To: Sharma, Rahul <rsharma AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Daniel Brandenburg <dbrandenburg.ufl AT gmail.com>; star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Distance from IP

 

Hi Rahul,

 

So the drawing shows the first disk at 154.49 cm and seems to be constrained by the support rod and inner size of cone.

It seems there are not so much from the drawing constraints that necesitaes the 9.25” of seperation between disks. I would actually think that cable and cooling 

routing will determin the minimum distance.

Comments?

 

best Flemming

 

 

 

Flemming Videbaek

senior scientist

videbaek @ bnl.gov

Brookhaven National Lab

Physics Department

Bldg 510D

Upton, NY 11973

 

phone: 631-344-4106

cell     :  631-681-1596

 

 

 

 

On Apr 8, 2020, at 02:33, Sharma, Rahul <rsharma AT bnl.gov> wrote:

 

Dear All,

 

I’m putting together the integration model with more realistic parts and installation scheme. Please check the attached distances from IP for your reference. With current design this is the best we can do without any interferences.

 

• Rahul

<Distance from IP.png>_______________________________________________
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l